Passenger car aerodynamics - Gas Savers - Fuel Efficiency Forum

Go Back   Gas Savers - Fuel Efficiency Forum > Fuel Economy > Aerodynamics
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-25-2007, 09:39 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
holypaulie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 108
holypaulie is on a distinguished road
Passenger car aerodynamics

I've found some interesting info about car aerodynamics http://www.wisil.recumbents.com/car_...g your mileage

holypaulie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 01:24 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lacey, Washington USA
Posts: 66
Graeme is on a distinguished road
Some good stuff. Like most of us shade tree engineers, some of his suggestions are questionable. One is the area of engine modifications. Unless I'm changing effective gear ratios, making the engine consume more air and fuel seem counterproductive when after greater FE. I've spent nearly fifty years tinkering with cars and I'm used to immediately jumping to cold air intakes, better exhaust, ported heads, etc. But unless I use that greater horsepower (gallons of gas) to drive a numerically lower effective gear ratio, I'm just burning more gas per mile--I think. It gives me a headache.
Graeme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 05:07 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Jim Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lake Mills, WI
Posts: 125
Jim Dunlop is on a distinguished road
Graeme, I always thought the hot air increased FE by putting a natural acceleration limiter on the driver, i.e. the accelerator pedal is less sensitive so you can't "stomp on it".

Add this to your headache: Doesn't a piston changing directions in the stroke "use up" power because the momentum changes? Also, for every inch the piston rubs against the wall there is friction, so you would in theory want the MOST power for the FEWEST revolutions per minute possible, for the engine to run efficiently and not waste power.

Installing an HAI decreases the power per stroke, right, because less combustion reactants can enter the chamber? So in my opinion, all the physics & chemistry point to the only benefit of Hot Air as being control over the driver. I experienced this firsthand because when I had my custom CAI pointing thru my fog light hole, I could touch the gas pedal and the car jumped.

Then again, there are those who point to "pumping losses", i.e. the engine wastes power in sucking cold [dense] air into the chambers, so hot [less dense] air contributes to efficiency.
__________________
http://www.gassavers.org/gaslog/sig.php?id=461
Team: Right Lane Rollers
Jim Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 08:12 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southeastern CT - USA
Posts: 722
brucepick is on a distinguished road
Yes the friction losses in the ICE are significant - especially when running at low throttle (high vacuum). Look in "experients", there was a post or thread recently where someone measured gallons per hour while idleing at various rpms. gph increase was pretty consistent with rpms increase. So there's a "tax" just to keep the ICE spinning that's related pretty directly to the engine speed.

I confess to reading that site quickly.
Mostly good stuff though!

Anyway, my understanding is, warm air intake = good.
Somewhere I read that optimum combustion air is 60-80 deg. F.
Hotter than that probably gets into the range where air density decreases too much. Colder inhibits combustion to some degree.

Only a calibrated air mixer of some kind can really get an optimum intake air temp. Some guys here had a thread re. building one but the electronics involved got beyond what I could follow.

The rear drive Volvos that my family drives had such an air mixer, but mechanical. One tube pulled from in front of radiator, the other pulled from a shell baffle positioned over the exhaust manifold. A wax-based thermostat controls a damper regulating the hot/cold mixture. Trouble is, the thermostat fails after x number of years with no warning, in the "pull in hot air" position. Result is that the air mass meter fails from being inundated with hot air from the exhaust manifold. So most of these cars now have had the damper removed and run on straight cold air.

My FE has been good this summer, mostly around 31-32. I fear a serious drop when temps get below 60. I could reinstate my original airbox with a new thermostat but I just don't trust it - could fail and kill the amm which is very expensive.
__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.

Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
http://www.gassavers.org/gaslog/sig.php?id=392
brucepick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 09:23 AM   #5
Member
 
lunarhighway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: belgium
Posts: 360
lunarhighway is on a distinguished road
my car has this too though i think it still works proppertl after 20 years... at least it does something...on hot days the valve thends to produce flapping noises... i think it's because when it's fully opened the mechanism allows it to vibrate in the airstream. althoug winter vs summer economy is vastly different.

i also notice that when my car starts to warm up there's a sudden increase in power... just when the temperature needle starts to move up... maybe it's the cold air valve opening?
lunarhighway is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A New Car Versus a Used Car Matt Timion Articles 37 02-24-2011 10:50 AM
How to go fast while flipping the bird to the oil monopolies: High performance electric cars The Toecutter Electric and Solar powered 10 03-11-2009 06:54 AM
1985 Pontiac Fiero: quite possibly the sportiest economy car out there! Peakster Car Reviews 33 04-14-2008 02:14 PM
Do other drivers ever get pissed off at you? 90CivicStandard General Fuel Economy Discussion 174 10-26-2007 10:47 AM
1980 Chrysler Cordoba: the most reliable vehicle I've owned Peakster Car Reviews 5 01-20-2007 04:20 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:17 PM.


Copyright 2005-2008 GasSavers.Org