1985 Pontiac Fiero: quite possibly the sportiest economy car out there! - Gas Savers - Fuel Efficiency Forum

Go Back   Gas Savers - Fuel Efficiency Forum > News and Articles > Car Reviews
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-07-2007, 02:39 PM   #1
Member
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina Canada (going to school in Winnipeg Canada)
Posts: 467
Peakster is on a distinguished road
Talking 1985 Pontiac Fiero: quite possibly the sportiest economy car out there!

Pros:
Very unique to drive, 2.5L engine is reliable, 37 mpg on the highway, futuristic/comfortable interior, it's domestic.

Cons:
Overdrive would be nice, needs constant monitoring as small problems quickly escalate.

417096_94_full.jpg

How I Got My Fiero:

I'm a kind of person that likes driving cars that are "out of the ordinary" so to speak. Thus was the reason why I always wanted a Pontiac Fiero. I like the razor edge styling of the early models and the general sporty look to the cars. Unfortunately, when I got my drivers license over 2 years ago, I wasn't able to afford one of these cars.

Here's my own personal car history: The first car I had was a 1986 Oldsmobile 88. That car was great (for being a $500 car), not because it looked cool or performed all that great, but because it was my first car. After two months of driving it, the engine's main bearing went after 230,000k and I had to get another vehicle.

My 2nd car was a 1980 Chrysler Cordoba and it was almost a perfect car for me. One drawback though; it was terrible on gas. So, I was then in search of a fuel efficient car...

That's when I got my 1989 Mazda 323 station wagon. It was great on fuel, but it was missing the "uniqueness" I was looking for in a car.

Then the most miraculous thing occurred.

When driving the 323 home from school, a lady driving a van hit me while changing lanes, totalling my car off.

A few days later, I got a phone call from my insurance company and they reimbursed me for the car. Guess how much they gave me. $2,105! I bought the car for $200! It was my lucky break. I finally had enough money for the car I've always dreamed about owning.

I immediately started looking in the local ads for a Fiero. It couldn't be just any Fiero either, I wanted it to be a 2M4 (4 cylinder model), have a sunroof, it had to have the "pointed front end" (not the aero style the later models have), and I wanted it to be black or red in colour. The reason why I wanted a Fiero so bad was because it had a lot of good things to offer: Current average price, fuel economy, safety, comfort, sportyness, decent speed and acceleration, and most importantly, the uniqueness I've been looking for in a car.

After a few weeks (or was it days?) of getting the money for my Mazda, I couldn't wait any longer for my ideal Fiero. I settled for buying a 1985 Sport Coupe model for $2,200. It doesn't have my colour preference (it's silver) but other than that, it's practically exactly what I wanted.

rear fiero.JPG

My Personal Experience:

This is probably one of the better conditioned vehicles I've ever owned. The first few nights of having the car I cruised it down Albert Street of Regina and was surprized to see how many people were taking the chance to line up with my car at every stoplight! With the engine in the rear, the pop up headlights, and the 2 seat configuration, this car is very sporty looking both inside and out. A lot of people I meet say that my car reminds them of the DeLorean featured in the movie "Back To The Future".

Mechanically, my car has a 2.5 litre, 92 horse "Iron Duke" engine with a 3 speed automatic... which is probably the slowest combination possible in this car. Fieros were also available in 130 horsepower 2.8 litre V-6s and 4 and 5 speed manual transmissions. I did a few minor modifications such as replacing the catalic converter with a straight pipe and installed a K&N air filter. With that in mind, this car does ok when it comes to acceleration. 0-50km/h is achieved in about 4 seconds (similar to my dad's Chrysler Intrepid) due to the car having a good power-to-weight ratio. However, when approaching highway speeds, the 4 cylinder has a harder time propelling because let's face it; 92 horse is 92 horse. 50-100km/h takes a whole 8 seconds with the gas floored. With the car in 3rd gear and the engine reving at 4500rpm (which is pretty much the "red-line") my car goes about 165km/h which is pretty much the same max speed as with any four cylinder car really.

So why didn't I get a 6 cylinder? well, the main reason was fuel economy. The 6 cylinders aren't all that great on gas during city driving and I do a lot of running around town. My car gets about 27 miles per US gallon in the city which is pretty darn good. On a recent road trip (doing 90km/h and very little wind) I got an amazing 37 miles per gallon! It only cost me $10 to fill up my tank after 187km (considering gas prices here in Canada). The 2nd reason is because the 6 cylinder is very tightly cramped into the engine compartment, so working on the engine would be even more difficult than the already cramped enough 4 cylinder. Even changing spark plugs would be hard. 3rd, the V-6s are the most desireable in a Fiero (because they generate nearly 50% more horsepower. Because of this, there is a significant price jump between the retail price of a V-6 compared to the inline 4. They often fetch in the $4000 range and that to me is a bit odd that I would spend $1800 more for a car that performs a little better.

Anyway, further on, the thing about the Fiero's fuel tank is that it couldn't be located in the rear, so it was put in a small area inbetween the seats of the car. Even with that great milage from the 2.5L Duke, you'll have to fill the tank up every 300kms or so because of the tank's size. From a complete empty, this car only takes 30 litres and so I have never fit more than $25 at a time into the car.

The location of the engine makes this car handle very well. Going around curves on the road at high speed is what this car is all about. It has almost no body roll and it never seems to be out of control in straightaways, even at speeds of 140km/h . The car doesn't have power steering but it's very tight and the slightest movement of the wheel makes this car change lanes rapidly on the highway.

The turning circle of the car is a bit surprising. you would think that a car with such a small wheel base would turn really well, but for some reason even U-turns are a bit tricky. Expect multi-point turns with this car if it's in a tight space.

The car comes with 4 wheel disk brakes which was a novelty in the mid 80s and makes brake jobs a lot less expensive, yet brake performance isn't much better than anything these days. I can still lock up the brakes and it doesn't stop on a dime. The brakes are also a bit harder to press than newer cars today.

Oh yeah, and this car's body panels aren't made of metal like most cars, just plastic-like material bolted on the car's Steel space frame (much like a real race car). This makes it not rust (and probably is the reason why they look good even for today) but the panels can crack upon impact and the paint often flakes off if it's still original. However the panels are a breeze to take off the car.

417096_8_full.jpg

The Interior:

The most obvious part of the car's interior is that it's a 2 seater. Thus don't expect a Fiero to be a family car, or even a multi-boyfriend car for that matter. After driving this car 55,000 kilometres I really don't have any regrets about choosing a 2 seater car, I really don't miss it. considering only two people can sit in the car, this car offers a lot of room to stretch out. The Fiero has incredible leg room and is really good for even the tallest of people. Head room is much the same and the car has an inviting spacious appeal once seated inside, especially if equipped with a sunroof.

The interior resists aging very well. My odometer showed over 240,000kms and there is not a single bit of wear or tear on the standard grey cloth upolstry. The dash or steering wheel were in good shape and there is very little warping of the interior pannels. The only real sign of wear on my car is on the bottom of the air vents where the dash sticks out futuristicly from the car near the doors. The reason why these are cracked is because they are very easily hit by people's feet when entering and exiting the car.

Speaking of entering and exiting the car, the Fiero is very low to the ground. probably 4 or 5 inches of clearance and the roof of the car is about the height of my naval. So, obviously you have to pretty much fall into your seat to get in and hoist yourself up to get out of the car. This does seem awkward, but once inside the car, it feels roomy and the position in which seated in is pretty comfy. The only thing that is somewhat annoying is that the dashboard is situated higher that a normal car, so a lot of people (including myself) wish to use cushions because there is no height adjustment for the seats. The seats themselves are firm, but they are still good for extended trips. They have a bucket shape and are highly supportive.

Oooh! and the coolest thing I found out about my car is that the instruments behind the steering wheel sticks out from the rest of the dash, so not only does it look cool, but the gap it creates works really well as cupholders! Practically a perfect fit for any normal sized beverage.

I had the original Delco tape deck in my car, but I replaced it with a CD player by Kenwood. The front speakers are 4"x10" in size, so they are a bit hard to come by if they need replacing (they were discontinued in the early 90s as use in GM products). My car has 3.5" speakers in the headrests of the car which is pretty cool. With 2 speakers per seat, they offer great stereo sound. One problem though is that if they ever needed replacement I wouldn't know how to get them out.

The glove compartment in this car isn't in the usual place (and I don't why one wasn't put in), it's located between the seats in an upright position. This makes it a bit harder to get into and there isn't much stuff you can put in it. There are no pouches in the doors (with the non-power-door lock models) or any other places to put things inside this car, so it's a bit annoying to find places for maps and stuff.

Trunk space is also limited. There's no formal trunk in the front (which surprised me), just a radiator, mini spare tire, windshield washer and brake fluid. There is space to put a small bag in the front but not much. The real trunk is actually in the rear! Behind the engine! Thus the trunk is very small and when I take off the sunroof (yes it's removable), it barely fits in the trunk. You can mayble put a few suitcases back there. Thank goodness I have a luggage rack on the rear engine lid (which actually kinda looks like a spoiler, so that's cool). This school year, I will attempt to take all my stuff for my dorm in the Fiero on a single trip.

Fuel Economy:
Fuel economy was great for a Lotus-look-alike. 55mph on the highway under optimum weather returned just over 37 mpg (2,600rpm at that speed) and city driving was a steady 27 mpg throughout the summer months. The 3-speed transmission goes though all of its gears very quickly and the torque-converter locks as low as 30mph (1,400rpm). a 5 speed transmission would've been even nicer for fuel economy. It's possibly the most exotic looking economy car out there.

417096_26_full.jpg

Reliablility:

My mom never did like my car, and neither did my dad, or my mechanic... Looking scary huh?

Actually the real reason why my mom doesn't like Fieros is because her friend bought one brand new in 1984. From then she had constant problems with it and hated it passionately. I never found out why she didn't like it, but it freaked out pretty much everyone in my family. Fieros also don't have a very good reputaion with the public either. Why? Well, because some allegedly caught on fire. Pontiac fixed that problem, but not before the general public was scarred for life.

Here's my thinking: If my car has 240,000km on the odometer and it hasn't burst into flames yet, I don't think it ever will. Plus I think that that problem was only for the 1984 Fieros cause GM sent out this brochure for the 1984 Fiero owners to have.

You should see this brochure! It's hilarious!. The brochure stresses about checking the oil, coolant, changing it regularly and actually has pictures on how to do this!!! How dumb can a person be?!?

Additionally, the 2.5 litre engine is also found in countless other GM products as well. S-10 pickups, Astro vans, Oldsmobile Calaises, Cieras, Chevy Celebrities... They all have the same engine and they're pretty reliable cars. Even the 6 cylinder is found in Berrettas, S-10s, Pontiac 6000s and many others.

So what gives that Fieros are considered unreliable? Well, they're generally not. The difference is this: you have a problem with your S-10 or Berretta, what do you do? Open up the hood and get it fixed right? Well, with a Fiero, the engine is a lot harder to get to than those vehicles and that's what makes them seem unreliable. With major repairs, they have to remove the engine from the bottom, fix it, and install it again.

I've owned my Fiero for 2.6 years and put 55,000km on my car since and this is the list of things that have needed repair:
-Starter x2 $500
-Brakes + rotors $200
-Brake master cylinder $100
-New tires $400
-Flat tire $14
-Headlight motors (never repaired them)
-Cruise control would work sometimes, other times not
-Check engine light comes on briefly once every week or so

417096_21_full.jpg

Winter Driving:

The Fiero handles above average in winter conditions. The braking distance is phenominal compared to many other cars (due to an ideal weight distribution) and the traction is also good with the engine being over the drive wheels.

Downsides include an insufficient heater below -20`C, a light front end that impedes steering at moderate speeds. Also, the throttle body fuel injection floods very easily and so it's near-impossible to start the car if the block heater isn't plugged in.

Safety Features:

These cars don't have anything out of the ordinary when it comes to safely features, but the Fiero is actually one of the safest cars on the road thanks to it's strong framing. It's achieved five star safety for both occupants (front, side and rear!) and this has probably also something to do with the engine being in the rear. With no engine in front, the more the front end can compact on collision and there's no chance of the engine being squished into the passanger compartment.

Overall, I really did enjoy my car. It has been a great experience driving it and would recommend it to anyone that doesn't need a lot of interior space.

One thing though... If I was able to go back into time, I probably wouldn't buy this same car again. Why not you ask? Well, after 1 year with the car's 4 banger, I think I would've liked the V-6 version. I'd love to find a Red with Tan interior 1985 SE V-6 model with a 4 speed manual in good condition. They look exactly like the coupe version (aside from a dual exaust) but go like stink! Apparently in stock form, it's capable of 0-60mph in 6.9 seconds!

Peakster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 02:49 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greeneville, TN
Posts: 55
Lincoln is on a distinguished road
Does this mean we have another Fiero owner on the board?

http://www.fiero.nl/ for Fiero information.
Lincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 03:05 PM   #3
Member
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina Canada (going to school in Winnipeg Canada)
Posts: 467
Peakster is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln View Post
Does this mean we have another Fiero owner on the board?

http://www.fiero.nl/ for Fiero information.
Oh I wish.

It got totalled in December 2005 (after a date with an SUV ):

fiero.JPG

I test drove a 1985 GT model (V6 automatic) this summer, but it needed a lot of TLC, too much for my liking. Seems like my old 2M4 was one of the last good ones left in my city.
Peakster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 04:39 PM   #4
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,779
cfg83 is on a distinguished road
Peakster -

I also loved the Fiero over the years, but hated it's overall practicality. It weighed too much to be a good commuter. 2600+ lbs is too much for a car that small. The early engine fire debacle doomed it's reputation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_Fiero). I could never justify it's lack of utility.

But the Kit Car crowd has loved it over the years. The plastic panels mean you can make it into anything.

It sounds like I hate the Fiero, but I don't. It's a beautiful car that came up short on some of my esoteric requirements.

At least the plastic technology migrated to Saturn .

CarloSW2
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 05:20 PM   #5
Member
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina Canada (going to school in Winnipeg Canada)
Posts: 467
Peakster is on a distinguished road
I found some crash test pictures dating back to 1984 (looks like the dummies heads hit the front windshield ):

417096_65_full.jpg

417096_67_full.jpg

417096_69_full.jpg
Peakster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 09:30 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Erik's Avatar
I have always liked the looks of the Fiero too.

When I was in college, I had a friend with the 6 cylinder version (I belive it was an 86- and interestingly enough, it was a canadian model that only had km/hour on the speedometer) that needed a new water pump. She knew that I did that sort of thing so I replaced it (I recall it being a very tight engine compartment). It was a 5 speed and of course I had to test drive it to be sure the new water pump didn't leak...

It was one of the quickest cars I have driven.
Erik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 09:55 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,223
MetroMPG is an unknown quantity at this point
<div id = "border-top"><div class="garage-wrap"><div class="garage-left"><a href = "/garage/view/14"
I've said elsewhere here (I think) that I drove a Fiat X19 once. Light, mid-motored, numble fun. DAX is going to have a hoot with his Beat.

PS - nice writeup, Peakster.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 06:45 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,978
rh77 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I've said elsewhere here (I think) that I drove a Fiat X19 once. Light, mid-motored, numble fun. DAX is going to have a hoot with his Beat.

PS - nice writeup, Peakster.
I agree. The mid-engine design is a blast to drive.

Since the engine wasn't easily accessible, a friend brought by a '99 Porsche Boxster by the house for "look-over" before buying it used for a steal of a deal. The drive was tremendous! Getting to the engine from under the car (on jack-stands) -- not so good.

Again -- another excellent write-up Peakster!

RH77
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 03:46 PM   #9
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,779
cfg83 is on a distinguished road
Hrrrmmmmmm, look at what the cat brought in :

Re: s-series vs corvair
http://www.saturnfans.com/forums/sho...11&postcount=5
Quote:
Your Saturn does have a parent car. From 1984 to 1988 GM built a car on a space frame chassis, with plastic body panels, an electronic fuel injected engine (4 cyl and 6 cyl versions), all stainless steel exhaust, and hydralic clutches on the stick versions.

It was also assembled in its own separate factory, keeping its production apart from the rest of the GM product line.

Best of all, it was a two passenger, mid engine car. The first Saturns were a clean - sheet continuation that carried over many characteristics of this car. If I took one of these cars and put Saturn badges on it, you would have a hard time pointing at any part of the car and saying 'this is nothing like a Saturn'.

Its kinda sad really because I bet 99% of Saturn owners cant even name the parent car!
I thought it was just the plastic panels. In a way, I guess I have a (fat 4 passenger) Fiero after all.

Can I put the Fiero badge on my SW2 ?

CarloSW2
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 03:47 PM   #10
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,779
cfg83 is on a distinguished road
Peakster -

And you must know about the Electric Fiero too, yes? :

http://greenplanet3.org/ev/

CarloSW2
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 06:19 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sterling, Massachusetts
Posts: 556
Lug_Nut is on a distinguished road
Doomed US 2 seaters:
Ford Thunderbird
rehashed Ford Thunderbird
Pontiac Fiero
Cadillac Allante
Chrysler T/C
Buick Reatta
Plymouth Prowler
AMC AMX

Successful US 2 seaters:
Chevrolet Corvette
Dodge Viper

The score is 7 to 2 against.
Apparently we want performance to back up the 'sporty' looks. A Chevy Citation turned around backward didn't do it for us. We don't want luxury and lack-luster performance, we don't want nostalgia if it's powered by a V6 from a Dodge intrepid, we don't want short wheelbase drag racing funny cars for daily drives.
We apparently just don't want domestic 2 seater cars.

Anyone care to look up the number of Miata sold in the US and compare that to the sales numbers of the domestic 2 seat cars listed above?
Lug_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 06:30 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,223
MetroMPG is an unknown quantity at this point
<div id = "border-top"><div class="garage-wrap"><div class="garage-left"><a href = "/garage/view/14"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lug_Nut View Post
Successful US 2 seaters:
Chevrolet Corvette
Dodge Viper
Geo Metro convertible

Quote:
Apparently we want performance to back up the 'sporty' looks.
Fuel efficiency is "performance" too, so I guess that statement stands.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2007, 07:39 AM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 38
jharbert is on a distinguished road
Take heart - the Pontiac Solstice is now outselling the Miata: http://news.windingroad.com/auto-new...ng-sports-car/
jharbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2007, 05:34 PM   #14
Wazabi SOLD May 2007 :(
 
Wazabi Owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 341
Wazabi Owner is on a distinguished road
NICE STORY Peakster, I love to hear stories about cars people have had.

Original 2 seater bird wasn't all that doomed, they just figured out they could sell WAY more if it seated more than 2 - they were right on. Of course, I wasn't there for that since I'm too young.

New T-Bird: Ford claims they never planned to make it more than a couple years and had planned it to be a "limited production vehicle" I'd remove those 2 from the doomed list and add 1. How about the Nash Metropoliton if you're going way back in time? Then again it had a bench seat so technically you could fit 3 in there. Also there is the new Saturn; Solstice brother....and the Cadillac XLR - for the most part those are limited production since most, not all people don't want 2 seaters.

A co-worker of mine has a 6cyl GT Fiero - cool car when it's running. Actually it runs great but has tranny problems. Still it's in excellent shape. Hmmm, how about a Pace Car Fiero.........

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lug_Nut View Post
Doomed US 2 seaters:
Ford Thunderbird
rehashed Ford Thunderbird
Pontiac Fiero
__________________
'08 Smart Passion - GREEN!
'93 Toyota Paseo
'91 Mercury Tracer
'86 VW Jetta Diesel
Wazabi Owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 12:35 PM   #15
Greenhorn
 
Golf3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 7
Golf3r is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lug_Nut View Post
Doomed US 2 seaters:
Ford Thunderbird
rehashed Ford Thunderbird
Pontiac Fiero
Cadillac Allante
Chrysler T/C
Buick Reatta
Plymouth Prowler
AMC AMX
Did anyone here like the Plymouth Prowler? Ive always thought that car was sweet looking and if i had the money I would have bought one, plus i still want one now . Just thought id say that.
Golf3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 01:29 PM   #16
Member
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina Canada (going to school in Winnipeg Canada)
Posts: 467
Peakster is on a distinguished road
Oh yeah, I forgot about the Prowler. Really popular in the late 90s, but they were super expensive. I wasn't a fan of them becaue it looked too hot-rod-ish & for some odd reason I never did like hot rods.
Peakster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 03:56 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Bill in Houston is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golf3r View Post
Did anyone here like the Plymouth Prowler?
I thought they were cool. I like the matching trailer.
Bill in Houston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2007, 04:00 PM   #18
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
SVOboy is an unknown quantity at this point
My ex girlfriend's dad had one, wasteful piece of crap in my opinion. Plus it was always in the shop for something.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 10:09 AM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orange County
Posts: 125
MorningGaser is on a distinguished road
I had a new 1986 Pontiac Fiero, and it was the worse car I have ever owned. It was the V6 model, and it guzzled gas worse then my cousin's F-150, and it cornered not much better then a Chevette, and way worse then anything in that sporty class back then. It had massive problems, in and out of the shop all the time. It's FI was very unrefined, and notchy. It had really bad Under-Steer during power drives, and the front end rattled really bad, as though parts of the front suspension were lose or something. Steering was losey-goosey, and never tracked straight without very vegelent corrections by the driver. It over heated all the time. It was fun to drive, but if one looks at ConsumerReports in the day, it scored really, really bad. These cars were notoriously horrible for reliability, and this had NOTHING to do with the engine being in the rear, nor because reaching engine parts is difficult...it was just a plain bad car, made during a time that GM made really bad cars....I got rid of this heap and replaced it with a 1988 Acura Ledgend, now that was a great car....250,000 miles later still no problems.
MorningGaser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 08:19 AM   #20
Member
 
ma4t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 175
ma4t is on a distinguished road
For a while, I wanted to get a Ferrari kit. I hear the Fiero is the best platform.



Others have made impressive replicars, like this one:
http://www.replicacountach.com/
ma4t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 08:37 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
skewbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
skewbe is an unknown quantity at this point
funny that this thread woke up, I was trying trying to look into how to cut tempered glass as a result of looking at Dave Clouds chop top metro (from what I gather, you don't. Just keep the windshield in one piece and use lexan elsewhere) and ran across a place that does fieros. I thought it looked pretty cool.
__________________
Standard Disclaimer
skewbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 09:54 AM   #22
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 231
Telco is on a distinguished road
I wanted one of those cars as soon as I first saw them. What is really nice is the engine sits in a cradle. Drop the cradle out, pull out whatever is in there, and a small block Chevy will bolt right in. That eliminates the power issue.

The main problem with the Fiero was not engine fires, it was faulty wiring. This did cause a few engine fires, but the main problem was odd electrical problems that couldn't be traced. Pontiac had a lot of wiring problems in the 80s in almost all their models, but since the Fiero was a brand new design, it was hit harder by the electrical issues. Combine this with its slow speed, and you have a total model killer. A 2 seat sports car should not get whupped up on by a cookie cutter family wagon, but GM just can't seem to understand this.

What I really, really wanted to do with it was drop in a 400 small block into one, then put on a Ferrari Daytona Spyder kit on it. Kit Car magazine had one on their cover. A buddy had one and I was able to drive it OK even though I was 6ft 4 and 190lbs at the time. I doubt I could manage with one now though, having blown out a knee at the gym combined with gaining 40lbs since my teenage years. Waist measurement is still smaller than my inseam though.

Since going the distance without burning a lot of gas has become important to me, I've thought that the Fiero would make a great all electric commuter. There would be plenty of room in the engine bay for an electric motor strong enough to drive it 70MPH, and have enough battery packs to be able to do a full day's worth of errands on a single charge, if you used some of the latest battery packs to come along.

The kit would have looked like this:


Now the Buick Reatta is a car I may still do. I drove one a few months back, and it was a fine automobile. The engine bay is huge and the 3.8L is small in there, so it could be made to take anything. The interior already has the provisions for a tranny tunnel, so it could be made into a rear wheel drive easily. And, they turned out 25MPG with decent power on the old Gen 1 3.8L, a more modern 3.8 would probably get it into the 30s with even more power. And, the car is based on the Riviera, so a lot of the non-Reatta-specific parts will still be easily available. And, even though they are now almost 20 years old, they are still sharp, modern looking cars. I think what killed them is GM overcharges for cars like this, they were 45 grand in the 80s new. What is really, really nice about the Reatta is while it is a 2 seater, it also has room behind the seats and a decent sized trunk. You can recline the seats quite a ways back, stick a small ice chest back there for trips, ect, and you have enough room in the trunk for a couple of bags and a couple of sets of golf clubs. It would be the perfect vacation car. It would also be very well suited to an engine built for fuel economy seeing as the car weighs in at under 3400lbs, and there is a lot of useless weight on the car that can be removed. I figure the Reatta would also make an ideal all-electric commuter.

Telco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 10:54 AM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: delaware
Posts: 135
ffvben is on a distinguished road
one car i liked was the ford GT. supercharged 5.4L sitting right behind your head It was neat to turn your head and see the supercharger belt spinning behind the glass. 500hp is sweet and only had the one recall where the a-arms would crack.
ffvben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 06:07 PM   #24
Supporting Member
 
88HF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: new orleans, la
Posts: 348
88HF is on a distinguished road
About the glass, I think its like any other mod, the more labor intensive it gets the less reproducible and the more expensive it will be. So, usually the best thing is to find ready made parts or glass from other vehicles/applications to fit your needs. Its really a universal idea to use off the shelf old parts and combine them in a unique new way.
88HF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 06:36 PM   #25
Supporting Member
 
Hockey4mnhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 760
Hockey4mnhs is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ffvben View Post
one car i liked was the ford GT. supercharged 5.4L sitting right behind your head It was neat to turn your head and see the supercharger belt spinning behind the glass. 500hp is sweet and only had the one recall where the a-arms would crack.
On the road i live on it is really hilly and has s turns all over the place. i was pulling out of my drive way and one of those came by so i chased up to it and when i got there he hammerd it and took off down the road it was awsome! i was in our f 150 and it has the same engine in it its kinda cool to think about how different the car is but the same engine powers it as there trucks.
Hockey4mnhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 05:03 AM   #26
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greeneville, TN
Posts: 55
Lincoln is on a distinguished road
For the diesel fans.

1987 Fiero, 4.3 Litre Diesel
http://members.tripod.com/~A350Diesel/dieselfiero.html
Lincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 08:37 AM   #27
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Thomaston, CT
Posts: 280
itjstagame is on a distinguished road
Sweet, diesel! I bet that moves very well with V6 diesel torque.

peakster: Sorry about your car, looks pretty good still, though, went right under the bumper of the SUV? Did it mess the suspension up? Looks like just a headlight and right fender....

As for the steering radius, do fieros have manual steering? If so I bet they kept a fairly number of turns lock to lock but limited it the max amount of steering (to make it easier to turn the wheel), also maybe they didn't want you to whip it around too fast and have the rear end come around on you?

Also (I realize you guys are mostly talking american cars but I just have to ask), have you driven a Mark 1 MR2 ever? I'm curious how it compared in feel and comfort. I just picked one up because it was cheap (at $300 delivered I couldn't say no) and I'd definately not describe it as having room to stretch out. I'm only 6' and only really fit comfortable with the TTop off. I also can't believe it'd be that safe, they seemed to make it as lightweight as possible and I can't see it taking much of an impact.

That's amazing you got 37MPG out of a 2.5L! I read on the MR2 boards that people get 25-30MPG with our little 1.6L and EPA was only 25. Even more strange are the HP numbers, our 1.6L was rated at 120HP. I would think the MR2 would have about the same aerodynamics and weighed less (about 2300lb from what I read), so it's odd how bad it is on gas. I plan on changing all that, of course, eventually whenever I get around to doing anything with it (it was cheap because it needs a clutch and I'm almost to the 1 year anniversary of owning it and doing nothing with it). I've only had it out a little bit, having a slipping clutch is a real detriment but it still out accelerates anything I've owned before and has incredible handling, I really can't wait to start tuning it 'someday'.

It's SOO ugly though, I wish it has the plastic panels like yours or a Saturn, lighter weight and no rust, plus easy to switch out. I've been looking for full plastic body kits but can't findanything, they are tons for the Mark 2 but none for the Mark 1.

Nice review, nice car.
itjstagame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 09:55 AM   #28
Greenhorn
 
nando_25567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: maryland, the park yo!
Posts: 8
nando_25567 is on a distinguished road
i got a mark 2 mr2 and it's the funnest car i have ever driven. yea i got around same millage but with new engine and a few mods, i get 34+ on highway. i 've had it for over a year and only replaced a couple things like new clutch and starter but overall very good car to drive. oh and very nice review, i'm going to do a write up very similar to yours but with an mr2
nando_25567 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 04:12 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
kamesama980's Avatar
I have an S10 with your engine. The flaming fiero problem was from people not keeping tabs on the oil so the engine would overheat, seize a bearing, throw a rod, and spit what little oil remained on the ehxuast manifold. using a V6 (I forget which) oil filter adds some capacity to the system to help with that.

because of the 3-speed auto giving such high highway RPMS, the fiber/laminate timing gear soemtimes wears down then explodes. replacements can be had for as little as $30 or 120-140 for all-metal gears but it's a pull-the-engine-out type job.

my S10 with it's lack of aerodynamics and 4-speed manual pulls pretty strong to the top of the speedometer (85mph) and then some sounds like it's trying to explode from the revs though so I typically keep it under 70 (before the 'you're going too fast' crowd chimes in, my mpg seems to be pretty proportional to my speed. my best mpg ever was doing the fastest sustained highway speed ever (75)

as for the fiero design/application, the thread was properly named...it's a sporty econo car. it was meant as a cheap econo car primarily, NOT a sports car. at the END of production they went "hey, people think this things a sports car" and actually used something other than leftover junk for the suspension and the 87 (or 88?) model years handled much better. the 2.8 V6 is a piece of junk by any standard. my old toyota 2.8 L6 from the same era is miles more advanced thus twice the power and half again the fuel economy.

as far as I can tell, The reason the duke gets such good mpgs vs the mr2 is that the duke is so undertuned and because of the excellent low end torque used for city driving. during normal driving, my truck is in 4th (last gear) by 30 mph (wild guess ~1000 rpm) and can accelerate fine from there wheras a toyota 4A, 3S, or whichever one they put in the MR2 has to get some revs behind it before it starts to get going. the low tuning comes into play with the above mentioned lack of heat: I have a full grill block and had to add 1/2 radiator block below 40f to get the engine up to (and stay at) operating temps. yes the coolant system is fine
__________________
-Russell
1991 Toyota Pickup 22R-E 2.4 I4/5 speed
1990 Toyota Cressida 7M-GE 3.0 I6/5-speed manual
mechanic, carpenter, stagehand, rigger, and know-it-all smartass
"You don't get to judge me for how I fix what you break"
kamesama980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 04:11 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
SD26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 529
SD26 is on a distinguished road
Wasn't the Fiero drive trail sourced from the Citation? They just turned it around for RWD? Citation was a good econo car at the time.
__________________
Dave
SD26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A New Car Versus a Used Car Matt Timion Articles 37 02-24-2011 10:50 AM
Some ridic article by some fool SVOboy Articles 40 04-25-2010 09:04 AM
Do other drivers ever get pissed off at you? 90CivicStandard General Fuel Economy Discussion 174 10-26-2007 10:47 AM
1980 Chrysler Cordoba: the most reliable vehicle I've owned Peakster Car Reviews 5 01-20-2007 04:20 PM
Consumer Reports: Fuel economy most important to car buyers ketel0ne Articles 4 08-27-2006 10:33 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Copyright 2005-2008 GasSavers.Org