 |
|
05-30-2007, 08:19 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: frozen north
Posts: 542
|
Hypermiling techniques WASTE lots of fuel?!?
Take a macro view of it: during the course of a hypermiler's trip, how many other vehicles barrelling along come up on a hypermiler doing extreme P&G or something and due to conditions or them not realizing what is going on, hit the brakes, de-activate the cruise control, slow way down (or not) and accelerate to pass again. Here we have one vehicle- the one that probably would be getting the best FE out of the lot of them at steady state cruise- potentially causing dozens or hundreds of guzzlers to interrupt their gait and guzzle even more... potentially causing more fuel useage than if the "hypermiler" went with the flow of traf f***! Of course if the hypermiler has the road to himself he is saving fuel compared to steady state cruise, or beating on it.
__________________
Tempo/Topaz:
Old EPA 23/33/27
New EPA 21/30/24
F150:
New EPA12/14/17
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 08:28 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,223
<div id = "border-top"><div class="garage-wrap"><div class="garage-left"><a href = "/garage/view/14"
|
Another example: there's one route I regularly use that has me coast a long distance up to a sensor-controlled light (ie. almost always red) to cross one of the major streets in the city.
By tripping the sensor, I can easily stop 8 or 10 cars.
I could take a much less efficient route for myself to preserve the "fleet" mileage by not tripping the red light on the busy street.
Or I could sit at the top of a slight incline before the sensor and wait for another car to come up behind me who would have tripped it anyway, then roll forward to trip the light and blame it on him/her
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 08:48 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
|
Hmm. That makes a lot of sense, clench. But, one rapid slow down and one rapid acceleration in that person's day is nothing compared to the bad FE decisions they make all day long. But, they still burn quite a bit of fuel in the incremental slowdown/speedup due to the hypermiler. Hmmm....
__________________
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 08:51 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,223
<div id = "border-top"><div class="garage-wrap"><div class="garage-left"><a href = "/garage/view/14"
|
Maybe we could make up for it by reaching through peoples' windows to shut off idling cars.
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 09:00 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pflugerville, Tx
Posts: 1,225
|
Ah but the hypermiler is causing the cellphone talker to pluse and glide even if they don't want to. The question would be does the 30% or better FE of the hypermiler make up for the 10%-15% decrease of FE of the stomp and go driver.
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 09:10 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,223
<div id = "border-top"><div class="garage-wrap"><div class="garage-left"><a href = "/garage/view/14"
|
Z has a point. One scenario where I will consciously control a following driver is approaching a red light where that driver has no other option but to stop also. Eg. there isnt a right turn lane, or a driveway for them to get into, etc.
In that case, I have no qualms about slowing early in an attempt to preserve some momentum for when the light goes green. So I am "forcing" them to save fuel that would otherwise have been wasted.
Of course, if they go apoplectic and take the next opportunity after the light to roar past me at WOT as a way to signal their displeasure, spewing unburnt HC out the exhaust as they pass...
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 09:13 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,223
<div id = "border-top"><div class="garage-wrap"><div class="garage-left"><a href = "/garage/view/14"
|
We could atone for our hypermiling sins by surreptitiously inflating other cars' underinflated tires with our 12v compressors in parking lots. Forgive me Michelin Man, for I have sinned...
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 09:23 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Idaho
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Or I could sit at the top of a slight incline before the sensor and wait for another car to come up behind me who would have tripped it anyway, then roll forward to trip the light and blame it on him/her 
|
Boy this thread went off the deep end. LOL
Naw, you need to pulse and glide real slow until someone passes you and they trigger the light. Then you get to roll through the light without stopping  .
__________________
usedgeo
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 09:50 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,516
|
Otoh, they are slowing down so the energy needed per unit time is less. Meh, I dunno. I figure it's a wash for their mileage, because I see the same isht happening in the left lanes, like having someone at 85mph come up on someone doing 70mph (aka 5mph over the limit) in the No1 lane. Everyone will likely impede someone, or be impeded by someone, but driving slower doesn't increase this ime. I can go 65-70mph in the far right lane and still have people riding my bumper. Since it's gonna happen right up to 10mph or so over the speed limit, I figure I might as well get better mileage when having people ride me instead of paying an extra 30-50% for gas and still having a car up my ***.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 10:03 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Maybe we could make up for it by reaching through peoples' windows to shut off idling cars.
|
ahh but that would be considered breaking and entering, or trespassing here in the states...and if someone catches you doing it: black eye or cops called
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 06:28 AM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southeastern CT - USA
Posts: 722
|
"Hypermiling techniques WASTE lots of fuel?!?"
Yikes.
I appreciate the thoughtfulness and consideration that went into the concept.
However this is right up there with the claims that slower drivers are unsafe because they foul up the faster drivers' pursuit of rapidity.
Those other drivers need to figure out how to get better FE. Their numbers are their responsibility, not ours. We are setting an example. My car now has a sticker saying "MPG". Short and sweet. This should help answer any following drivers' questions re. "WHY is that guy driving so slow, and how come he's speeding up on the downhill?"
We hypermilers are the leading edge of what should become the new fuel economy patterns. To quote another thread somewhere, I'll modify my driving patterns to suit other drivers when they pay for my gas.
__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.
Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 06:54 AM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher
if they have their wits about them they can easily pass and not even dis-engage their cruise control (surprising how many will brake and sit back there for a while even though I'm riding the ridge  ).
|
I noticed this on my latest long drive, and was quite surprised. I was on 2-lane back roads, where the speed limit was 65 or 70 mph, and even though I was going 55 or 60, people would just poke along with me even though there were ample passing opportunities. I had expected everyone to just blow around me. Actually, I was hoping that they would pass and then I could draft them. :-) But instead they just hung out with me, not even riding my bumper or anything. Weird.
__________________
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 07:03 AM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southeastern CT - USA
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill in Houston
... I was hoping that they would pass and then I could draft them. :-) But instead they just hung out with me, not even riding my bumper or anything. Weird.
|
Maybe some are starting to learn that they can save gas by driving slower.
True that there are plenty out there who don't want to change or learn anything new. But we have to hope and expect that some are "getting on the train" every week. Um, last summer I was driving 70 and enjoying high revving downshifts. This summer I'm enjoying nice coasts and tight s-curves at 40 mph.
__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.
Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 07:59 AM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 758
|
I've ridden with enough people to know that some of them simply don't pay allot of attention to their speed. Many don't really intend to exceed the limit, but in a relatively quiet and smooth riding car, it tends to go that direction if left unimpeded. They only realize their error when somebody does slow them down, or during that 'oh-sh*t moment' when a cop is spotted ahead.
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 08:51 AM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 231
|
Brucepick has it down. We can only be responsible for our own actions, not the actions of others. The only thing you can do is discuss it with anyone that will listen, and the easiest way to convince them is through their wallets. I know it worked for me. After I figured out what it would cost me to get my 96 Tahoe into the 30MPG range, I ditched it for a minivan. Once my old teenagers move out, it goes in favor of a small sports car. Looking to have both vehicles in my family well into the 30s by 2010, at a minimum. This isn't high by this site's standards, but is twice what I was getting just 5 years ago.
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 09:04 AM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 463
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucepick
However this is right up there with the claims that slower drivers are unsafe because they foul up the faster drivers' pursuit of rapidity
|
IIRC, studies have found that to be true. The safest speed to travel is that of the surrounding traffic. Faster or slower increases your likelyhood of being involved in an accident.
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 09:07 AM
|
#17
|
|
Team GasMisers5!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NZ (was Scotland, UK)
Posts: 440
|
If you slow traffic to the speed limit, that should be no problem! (note - posted before I saw the post above)
I have to admit, I do sacrifice my economy 'for the greater good' if I am going downhill, to turn off a major onto a minor road, with a lorry (=18-wheeler) behind me. I will go up the hill slightly slower than he wants (but still accelerating so he isn't braking), then go downhill at e.g. 45mph, put the indicator on, then accelerate to 60mph, then brake to 3mph and turn when he is significantly behind me. If I didn't do this he would slow from 60-0mph, which is probably enough CO2 emissions to power my car for many miles of normal driving!
__________________
 
Team GasMisers5 - #1 for first three rounds of the original GS Fuel Economy Challenge
Miles displaced by e-bike since 1 Jan 2008: 62.6 ( 0 kWh used)
Hypomiler
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 11:10 AM
|
#18
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 28
|
yep
And let's not forget by choosing certain routes you can easily increase you mpg at the expense of total gas used.
__________________
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 11:24 AM
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newport RI USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Well I will push my speed 5 over if someone wants to go a little faster but not on the highway unless there is a lot of traffic then you end up getting enough drafting effects to offset the higher speed. Get a couple of trucks cooking down the highway and I will fall in behind them in a second if they are going my way - only a few seconds on the throttle to get up to speed then ride their wake for a while at a few hundred MPG isn't hard to take. With the VVTi engine the P&G doesn't really work in my xB that well only the updown hill stuff where I can hold the speed and throttle steady up the hill and coast down the back side and sometimes the fuel cutoff with a little speed limiting is better than the coasting fuel useage when I have to stop anyway. Got one light that I get that turns green in 10 seconds after a car arrives at it if it hasn't turned recenty so that one I watch from a distance and get someone else to trip it. The trick is to get there in time or I end up waiting longer for it to change again.
If we all could behave ALL the time (I know I don't) we could have a sticker that says . . .
"Drive like me for better MPG!"
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 01:16 PM
|
#20
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 760
|
people just need to slow down thats about it
__________________
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 01:32 PM
|
#21
|
|
FE nut
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,020
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey4mnhs
people just need to slow down thats about it
|
I agree 100%.
__________________
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall, torque is how much of the wall you take with you.
2007 Prius,

Team Slow Burn
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 01:46 PM
|
#22
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 230
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey4mnhs
people just need to slow down thats about it
|
Almost...they need to slow down, look ahead, THINK and then act accordingly...
__________________
-- Randall
McIntyre's First Law: " Under the right circumstances, anything I tell you may be wrong."
O'Brien's First Corollary to McIntyre's First Law: " I don't know what the right circumstances are, either."
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 01:58 PM
|
#23
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Endicott, NY
Posts: 202
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvanengen
Almost...they need to slow down, look ahead, THINK and then act accordingly...
|
THINK? Other drivers know how to think? Even today on my drive in... I was coming up through a 1 lane on the highway (other lane closed for construction) at 55 MPH, a big ol' Dodge Ram Pickup was on my a** the whole way, as soon as we cleared the construction, ZOOM! He went right up to 80. If people only knew how deep the hole they are digging is. Hell, even that they're digging a hole!
It's amazing how many people I meet that say "D*mn the gas prices are high! I wish they would come down" as they fill their Excursion SUV and then hop on the freeway with the AC on at 80. Duh!
__________________
2005 Saturn VUE 2.2L 5-Speed FWD
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 02:48 PM
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 675
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher
Ah, but the cell phone yakker's idea of P&G is to ride the brake with the left foot and ride the gas with the right... 
|
theclencher: Thanks for the laugh. Their is a lot of unfortunate truth to this, but I hadn't heard it phrased this way, before.
As far as overall fuel use is concerned, I think it really is a aggregate balance that we need to strive for, considering our safety, other peoples safety, our efforts to economize and potentially it's affect, good or bad, on the economy of other drivers.
What a mouth full! Anyway, in my consideration, if your driving a little slower, but as a result your able to keep yourself and the cars behind you from coming to stomp on it breaking, or acceleration, then I suspect that on the aggregate you are helping them to achieve better mileage than they would if they didn't have someone to pace them. If they decide to jam and get around you, so they can catch up to someone else to follow, then you really don't have any control over that.
Ultimately, you really only have control over what you do and if what you are doing is within reason and is not unduly creating a unnecessary problem for other people, or safety, then I think you can do what ever you wish. If what your doing starts to impede the safety of yourself or others, even if it's just because the yoyo in the SUV get's pissed off, then I think you owe it to yourself, your family and the community as a whole, to not do those things, at that time.
Way to over analyzed!
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 03:48 PM
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
|
Ya, if there are always people behind you, I think it would not be nice or helpful to do P&G. Just keep a steady speed, and allow people to pass you when they feel like they need to.
__________________
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 10:28 PM
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 758
|
I don't think it's as bad as that Clencher. If traffic is that thick and moving smoothly, there's probably a good draft to pick up that would outperform P&G antics. Even if there isn't a draft per se, that much traffic can definately generate a current.
That said, I only do it when there's nobody behind me to hinder.
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 12:33 AM
|
#27
|
|
Greenhorn
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
|
i'm a east coaster and a frequent traveler on I-95 from nc to south fla. i think trying to roll at 60 mph will get you killed with a 80 to 85 mph norm
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 02:10 AM
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,516
|
Only if you try to do it in the No.1 lane. A similar idea is that some people cruise at ~100mph (which they do), so going 80mph can be pretty dangerous too. The person at 100mph takes longer to slow down to 80mph than the person at 80mph takes to slow down to 60mph.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 03:26 AM
|
#29
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 98
|
If you've seen the Autobahn, you know way more extreme speed differences can coexist. It just takes some attention from everyone, along with the idea that whatever speed you want to drive at is OK. Slow drivers are prepared to speed, but fast drivers are prepared to slow down.
I don't think passing takes that much power on freeways, unless you're going 20 under the speed limit. Since I've been there, I assume those cars are limping to the next exit. The main time I get flak for going the speed limit is on 2-lane roads. There's not much you can do there but go steady, and hope they grow some balls and pass you. Mostly they just stick behind you and cruise. These are the roads you could hang a red triangle and go 25 max with perfect authority. If they want to burn fuel zipping past, it's not your problem.
I can see how extreme under-the-limit driving could cause so many to get frustrated that they'd burn lots of fuel. So don't do that... just go as slow as is normal. They would have burned the fuel anyway.
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 03:53 AM
|
#30
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 114
|
Is is just me, or is anyone else noticing other drivers are starting to slow down. I used to get passed like I was standing still. Now more people are doing the same as I am, 5 MPH under the speed limit.
__________________
David
85 Chevrolet. 30 MPG or bust!
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Classifieds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|