Home Forums Garage Blogs 201 Tips To Save Gas News Reviews Coupons FAQ UserCP Articles
  Mark All Forums Read -  Glossary -  Search The Forums -  View Recent Posts Log Out 

Go Back   GasSavers HomePage > Forums > Fuel Economy > General Fuel Economy Discussion

General Fuel Economy Discussion Ask the gas gurus about increasing fuel economy. Post ideas and ask for advice. For testing help, use the "Experiments" forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2005, 01:50 PM   #1
SVOboy
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,406
The Condensator: Just a PCV Jar?

<a href=http://www.condensatorsales.com/html/what_s_a_condensator_.html target=_blank>The Condensator</a>

So my impression of this thing is that it is just a pcv jar that has been manufactered on that large scale. So for 179 bucks then, they of course would be a rip off.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 03:01 PM   #2
Flatland2D
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 153
It is just a really

It is just a really expensive PCV jar. Maybe they had a mold made for their design that costs thousands of dollars and that's why they sell them for so much. This is one of the devices I was referencing in my thread about outrageous prices.

I've heard no one has been able to sell PCV jars because this company has threatened legal action (able maybe even followed through with it) against all it's competitors. They claim to have the patent for it so that stops everyone else from even trying. Maybe there is a small change you could make that would allow you to circumvent their patent. Posting free plans online for similar devices does not violate their patent I believe, so go build your own.

And someone, please, tell them how to spell ABSORBENT! It is most unprofessional for a company like this to be misspelling words. It just gets on my nerves when companies can't spell important words in their field of study/sales.
__________________
Scouring the country for an excellent condition Civic VX
Flatland2D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 03:04 PM   #3
SVOboy
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,406
Copyrights

That's annoying about their patent. There are lots of different things that do the same thing, I don't really understand why someone like you couldn't patent the one you made.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 03:07 PM   #4
Matt Timion
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,993
After seeing this...

I've decided that I am going to put together a few PCV catch can kits using the water filters from air tools and sell them on this site. I'll sell for a small markup. All that the kit will include will be the parts and instructions. It will be for people who want to build their own, but are unable to find the parts (or just too lazy to do it).

Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 03:15 PM   #5
SVOboy
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,406
How much are you looking at

How much are you looking at pricewise?
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 03:16 PM   #6
Flatland2D
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 153
That's a good idea. I don't

That's a good idea. I don't think you'll have any problems with it since you're not selling a completed unit. I wonder how far you could go with that idea. Maybe you could even put part of the kit together yourself and let the customer finish it. I wonder if you could even put the whole thing together minus some critical piece that the customer could just slap on that would make it a working PCV jar. That way you're not selling a functional unit. Might want to look into the legality of that if you choose to do so.
__________________
Scouring the country for an excellent condition Civic VX
Flatland2D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 07:22 PM   #7
Matt Timion
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,993
I'm sure I could sell

I'm sure I could sell completed units and call them "PCV Air Filters" or something like that.

Then again, I could just sell the pieces (three pieces total) and then describe how to put them together.

I don't know how this one guy can have a patent on a PCV Catch Can. There are many racing companies that sell their own version of them.

Anyway, for price I'd probably do something like $40 or something more/less. I could even sell it with a piece of 1/4 inch hose so that the buyer won't have to hack up their existing hose.
Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2005, 09:40 AM   #8
nrgrebel
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5

patents on condensator..

A quick search of US patent database shows last patent for the inventor, Elmer W. Bush was granted in 1983. Should have expired by now??? Furthermore one could simply change/improve on it and have a device they could call their own. I'm working a system that is a variation on the condensator, but I've set it so that it runs with a vacuum of 8-10" in the crankcase. This aids ring sealing, oil drainback/control, reduces pumping losses etc much like a pump driven evacuation system would.
nrgrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2005, 02:56 PM   #9
Matt Timion
Driving on E
 
Matt Timion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,993
Re: patents on condensator..

Quote:
Originally Posted by nrgrebel
A quick search of US patent database shows last patent for the inventor, Elmer W. Bush was granted in 1983. Should have expired by now??? Furthermore one could simply change/improve on it and have a device they could call their own. I'm working a system that is a variation on the condensator, but I've set it so that it runs with a vacuum of 8-10" in the crankcase. This aids ring sealing, oil drainback/control, reduces pumping losses etc much like a pump driven evacuation system would.
I'm not certain how long patents are good for, but it may not be expired yet. If your invention is significantly different from the condensator I doubt there would be a violation.

Since you are working on a similar system, let me ask you a simple question. How much different is this sytem from the simple air filter used to seperate oil from the PCV line?
Matt Timion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2007, 02:26 PM   #10
trk2007
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1

"absorbent" not mispelled

I thought about this too. But nobody trying to market this would be so stupid, so I looked it up. There are variations of the word. Some people spell it ADSORBANT like the Condensator people, most others, ADSORBENT. So maybe they're not idiots after all. Here's the def from wiki:

Adsorption is a process that occurs when a gas or liquid solute accumulates on the surface of a solid or, more rarely, a liquid (adsorbent), forming a molecular or atomic film (the adsorbate). It is different from absorption, in which a substance diffuses into a liquid or solid to form a solution. The term sorption encompasses both processes, while desorption is the reverse process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatland2D View Post
It is just a really expensive PCV jar. Maybe they had a mold made for their design that costs thousands of dollars and that's why they sell them for so much. This is one of the devices I was referencing in my thread about outrageous prices.

I've heard no one has been able to sell PCV jars because this company has threatened legal action (able maybe even followed through with it) against all it's competitors. They claim to have the patent for it so that stops everyone else from even trying. Maybe there is a small change you could make that would allow you to circumvent their patent. Posting free plans online for similar devices does not violate their patent I believe, so go build your own.

And someone, please, tell them how to spell ABSORBENT! It is most unprofessional for a company like this to be misspelling words. It just gets on my nerves when companies can't spell important words in their field of study/sales.
trk2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2007, 06:08 AM   #11
ZugyNA
Member
 
ZugyNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 593

Yes...adsorption is not the same as absorption.

I have 2 Condensators. I've read all the patents and I've "reverse engineered" them so to speak. It's all in the details. They work...at least for one car...the truck hasn't shown much of a gain though.

The air line filter is not the best PCV jar design...too small and restrictive.
__________________
Leading the perpetually ignorant and uninformed into the light of scientific knowledge. Did I really say that?

a new policy....I intend to ignore the nescient...a waste of time and energy.
ZugyNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Civic VX PCV valve, or lack there of. Ryland Automotive Tech 12 02-27-2009 08:29 AM
PCV Catch Jar Question repete86 Automotive Tech 29 11-27-2006 06:38 PM
Questions about PCV Compaq888 Troubleshooting and Repair 28 06-09-2006 09:27 PM
PCV jar not working as expected Flatland2D General Fuel Economy Discussion 31 01-27-2006 12:05 AM

Common topics of discusion include: gas mileage, fuel economy, best gas mileage car, MPG, miles per gallon, acetone, increase gas mileage
Archive Links: General Fuel Economy Dicussion - Experiments - General Tech - Automatic Transmissions - Diesels - Aerodynamic Modifications -
How To/Do It Yourself - Articles - Around the House - Electric/Solar Powered - People Powered - Vegetable Oil/Bio-Diesel - Hotel Price Comparison - VPS Hosting - Content Writing - Managed Hosting

 
Copyright 2005-2008 GasSavers.Org