Home Forums Garage Blogs 201 Tips To Save Gas News Reviews Coupons FAQ UserCP Articles
  Mark All Forums Read -  Glossary -  Search The Forums -  View Recent Posts Log Out 

Go Back   GasSavers HomePage > Forums > Tech, Troubleshooting and Repair > Automotive Tech

Automotive Tech Questions about your car that do not relate to fuel economy or automotive repair go here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-2006, 08:22 AM   #1
lovemysan
Member
 
lovemysan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 650
FE alignment

Toecutter said in a different thread that a truck could be aliqned for higher fuel economy. Basically you zero everything. What would be the negative drawbacks of this?
__________________
02 Saturn SL
5 speed
for pics click the link below

http://s75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...emysan/saturn/


"for best mileage swap in a d15z1"
lovemysan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 08:42 AM   #2
vegasjetskier
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 33

The downside could be twitchy handling if you miss the mark and set it with "toe out." Most manufacturers spec the alignment so that it winds up at zero with the car at road speed under power with the flexible suspension components compressed or stretched. If you alter this to zero while the vehicle is stationary, who knows what it will be when you are driving?

Also, you could have accelerated tire wear, additional drag on the car, and reduced fuel economy.
vegasjetskier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 10:31 AM   #3
SVOboy
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,406
That's one risky alignment! When we'd align it at the shop most things would be set for 0 camber and 0 toe and whatev caster. Camber will actually reduce contact patch (which is why extreme camber makes traction hard to attain) but will improve cornering. Toe is just toe, it should be 0 regardless, even though it's usually speced to something very nearly but not always 0.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 11:56 AM   #4
The Toecutter
Baby Killer
 
The Toecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 836
Quote:
Basically you zero everything. What would be the negative drawbacks of this?
Depends on the vehicle.

Some vehicles have alignment adjusted for optimum handling or traction, as opposed to fuel efficiency. Some vehicles have it already adjusted for efficiency; those are the vehicles you don't want to change.

A VW Karmen Ghia, for instance, benefits heavily from a zeroed alignment in regard to efficiency. Its alignment was originally speced for cornering capability, as opposed to efficiency.
The Toecutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 12:10 PM   #5
thisisntjared
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: southern nj
Posts: 1,516
camber or caster wont effect tire wear or fuel efficiency unless it really extreme.

the toe angle is what will eat your tires and cause more drag. ideally if your car isnt a race car, set the toe to 0 all around.

i anticipate some opposition as far as the facts of camber and yes excessive camber does a distinctive type of tire wear, but the acceleration of this wear is dictated by the associated toe. usually when you change your camber(or anything in your suspension for that matter) the toe is changed just from the adjustment in suspension geometry. i hope i dont get flamed for this, but if you think about it, it makes much more sense.

the bottom line: dont worry so much about your camber unless its really bad, just get the toe to 0
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 12:12 PM   #6
SVOboy
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,406
This isn't a honda-tech battle over camber, don't worry!
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 01:51 PM   #7
thisisntjared
|V3|2D
 
thisisntjared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: southern nj
Posts: 1,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy
This isn't a honda-tech battle over camber, don't worry!
:whipes sweat from forehead: "whew!"
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 02:10 PM   #8
Gary Palmer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 754
Should I get out flame's? I don't think so. In my experience, the toe is by far the most critial, in terms of tire wear and mileage. What I do is set up the camber for very nearly vertical and then check to see if I'm getting any pull to one side or the other. On my van I had to set it so that I have a small amount of positive on one side and a small amount of negative on the other, to get it to not pull to one side. Once I got that neutral, I adjusted the toe-in and it drives and handles real well. As far as tire wear, with the small amount of camber I had to put in, it doesn't seem to increase tire wear, as nearly as I can tell. At least it's not enough to make it worth trying to get the rear alignment done, so it doesn't have the slight pull.

I have a tool I built for doing the toe-in alignement that work's pretty well and it's relatively easy to use. If ya'll promise to be nice to thisisn'tjared, I could share it. I've thought about getting it copyrighted, or something, but I don't have the money and I don't know how much of a market their might even be. I just get galled every time I take a car to get it aligned and I get some technician who "alway's" finds something wrong, so I pay for a realignment and then I end up having to go back and fix what he adjusted, so it will drive straight and not scrub the tire's into the belt's.
Gary Palmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 02:14 PM   #9
Gary Palmer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 754
p.s. I usually set my toe for just a small, like 1/32" of toe in.
Gary Palmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 02:25 PM   #10
SVOboy
*shrug*
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,406
Keep the tool a secret! I still need to string up my car for toe. Camber I couldn't give a damn about unless it got > 3 degrees or so.
SVOboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official Thread for posting daily FE updates krousdb General Fuel Economy Discussion 1559 08-06-2008 08:29 PM
Misc winter FE thoughts... DracoFelis General Fuel Economy Discussion 13 03-09-2007 11:40 PM
Horrible Gas Milage! mexellent General Fuel Economy Discussion 27 10-13-2006 03:59 PM
FE, "friction modifiers", and additives. DracoFelis General Fuel Economy Discussion 28 09-05-2006 12:37 PM
FE Test after Wheels, Spoilers, Added to HCH II: Pics & Techniques: tigerhonaker Articles 0 07-14-2006 05:03 PM

Common topics of discusion include: gas mileage, fuel economy, best gas mileage car, MPG, miles per gallon, acetone, increase gas mileage
Archive Links: General Fuel Economy Dicussion - Experiments - General Tech - Automatic Transmissions - Diesels - Aerodynamic Modifications -
How To/Do It Yourself - Articles - Around the House - Electric/Solar Powered - People Powered - Vegetable Oil/Bio-Diesel - Hotel Price Comparison - VPS Hosting - Content Writing - Managed Hosting

 
Copyright 2005-2008 GasSavers.Org