Home Forums Garage Blogs 201 Tips To Save Gas News Reviews Coupons FAQ UserCP Articles
  Mark All Forums Read -  Glossary -  Search The Forums -  View Recent Posts Log Out 

Go Back   GasSavers HomePage > Forums > Fuel Economy > Diesels

Diesels Discuss your diesel vehicle and how to save on fuel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2006, 03:05 PM   #1
Sludgy
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 617
Thumbs up Truck tires

I have a choice of replacing my stocks 265-75-R16 tires with 235-85-R16 or 315-75-R16. Heres' the relevant data for BF Goodrich tires

315 68 pounds 601 revolutions per mile 3.42 (effective) axle ratio
265 54 pounds 656 revolutions per mile 3.73 axle ratio
235 47 pounds 654 revolutions per mile 3.72 (effective) axle ratio

The big 315 tires lower the axle ratio, but they will add 56 pounds of rotating mass to the truck; and they increase the frontal area of four tires by about 2 square feet.

The narrow 235 tires lower the axle ratio a fraction (almost no effect); they remove 28 pounds of rotating mass from the truck; and they reduce the frontal area by 1 square foot.

Will the 315's lower axle ratio make up for their added mass and frontal area, or would the 235's tires get better mielage?
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 07:14 PM   #2
red91sit
Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sludgy
I have a choice of replacing my stocks 265-75-R16 tires with 235-85-R16 or 315-75-R16. Heres' the relevant data for BF Goodrich tires

315 68 pounds 601 revolutions per mile 3.42 (effective) axle ratio
265 54 pounds 656 revolutions per mile 3.73 axle ratio
235 47 pounds 654 revolutions per mile 3.72 (effective) axle ratio

The big 315 tires lower the axle ratio, but they will add 56 pounds of rotating mass to the truck; and they increase the frontal area of four tires by about 2 square feet.

The narrow 235 tires lower the axle ratio a fraction (almost no effect); they remove 28 pounds of rotating mass from the truck; and they reduce the frontal area by 1 square foot.

Will the 315's lower axle ratio make up for their added mass and frontal area, or would the 235's tires get better mielage?
I dunno where you live, but aroudn here the thinner tires will help you cut through the snow/slush and corner better where as the wider tire will help you drive over the soft powder with out sinking in as much.

I'm thinking hte 315's will hurt mileage, they are a rather large amount wider than the 235's this will not only hurt frontal area, but disrupt more of the flow under the vehicle. The higher vehicle will have slightly more drag, not to mention i'm guessing the 315's will have more rolling resistance.
__________________
red91sit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 08:16 PM   #3
Red
For da Llama!
 
Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 581
What kind of BFG do you plan on running?
__________________
Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 07:31 AM   #4
Sludgy
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red
What kind of BFG do you plan on running?
I was thinking of the BFG All Terrain T/A KO's, but that tread pattern looks noisy, and could add wind resistance. I'm now considering 235/85 16 Michelin snows or all season tires. Michelin has a great reputation for economy, but BFG has a reputation for traction and off road toughness. <stumped>
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 09:54 AM   #5
Sludgy
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 617
Never heard of Douglas tires
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 08:50 AM   #6
Sludgy
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 617
I'm about to drive 500 miles in a blizzard tonight, so I went out and got new tries for the F350. I replaced the stock Goodrich Long Trail 265/75-R16 with Michelin LTX M/S 235/75-R16. They're skinnier and lighter, but have nearly the same diameter (Michelins are ~0.1 inch taller)

Although driving in snow tonight is not a fair test, in a few weeks I'll be able to see whether there's a mileage improvement.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 12:26 PM   #7
lovemysan
Member
 
lovemysan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher View Post
Speaking of tires, how does the Douglas brand measure up? Did a websearch and mostly found forums, so of course some people swear by them and others swear at them.

I'm thinking: 45,000 mile rating; treadwear, temp, and traction ratings similar to most others... sure they are a cheaper tire but does that make them junk?
I had douglas tires before. There not that bad. Just don't expect a whole lot. I had a set on my sunfire. I did end up with some cupping but the car had 180k on it and the wheel bearings could have needed replacement.
__________________
02 Saturn SL
5 speed
for pics click the link below

http://s75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...emysan/saturn/


"for best mileage swap in a d15z1"
lovemysan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:31 AM   #8
Sludgy
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 617
Narrow tires

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sludgy View Post
I'm about to drive 500 miles in a blizzard tonight, so I went out and got new tries for the F350. I replaced the stock Goodrich Long Trail 265/75-R16 with Michelin LTX M/S 235/75-R16. They're skinnier and lighter, but have nearly the same diameter (Michelins are ~0.1 inch taller)

Although driving in snow tonight is not a fair test, in a few weeks I'll be able to see whether there's a mileage improvement.
I got 18 mpg on the first tank after installing the 235 tires. The first 200 miles were in 4wd because of snow, so it was hardly a fair test. Still, the truck feels lighter with the smaller tires. I 'll wait for a fair test when warmer weather arrives.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Now up to 57.3 mpg at 60 mph in my 97 Saturn SC1 cheapybob General Fuel Economy Discussion 52 09-25-2009 09:08 PM
Perfect Base Car For Super Aero Car/EV? Mighty Mira Aerodynamics 42 04-24-2008 05:35 PM
New Fuel Efficient Tires Could Save Long Islanders $150 And Reduce U.S. Oil Dependancy By 275,000 Barrels a Day Matt Timion Articles 12 04-05-2008 10:23 AM
*The official what works to improve miles per gallon thread* Compaq888 General Fuel Economy Discussion 69 06-07-2007 09:56 AM
Has anyone thought of using 4 'donut' tires? Peakster Experiments 57 02-03-2007 09:57 AM

Common topics of discusion include: gas mileage, fuel economy, best gas mileage car, MPG, miles per gallon, acetone, increase gas mileage
Archive Links: General Fuel Economy Dicussion - Experiments - General Tech - Automatic Transmissions - Diesels - Aerodynamic Modifications -
How To/Do It Yourself - Articles - Around the House - Electric/Solar Powered - People Powered - Vegetable Oil/Bio-Diesel - Hotel Price Comparison - VPS Hosting - Content Writing - Managed Hosting

 
Copyright 2005-2008 GasSavers.Org