Home Forums Garage Blogs 201 Tips To Save Gas News Reviews Coupons FAQ UserCP Articles
  Mark All Forums Read -  Glossary -  Search The Forums -  View Recent Posts Log Out 

Go Back   GasSavers HomePage > Forums > Fuel Economy > Aerodynamics

Aerodynamics Discuss tips and tricks to make your vehicle more aerodynamic.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2007, 08:10 PM   #1
James
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 266
Check out the bottom of the civic hybrid

check out the bottom of my dad's civic hybrid. The Cd is supposedly .27, and it has a partial belly pan under part of the front of the car and near the back. It is suspiciously missing sections on either side behind the rear wheels.

Wouldnt there be less drag with these areas covered? it doesnt seem like it would cost very much to cover these areas, if they were already putting a plastic panel in that area. Any guesses why they wouldnt cover those areas?
At least on one side, it wouldnt be anywhere near the exhaust...even on the exhaust side, some improvement could easily be made. also, the lip of the rear bumper is a sharp edge that sticks out and overlaps the belly pan, it looks as if it would catch some air.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN0111.JPG (86.8 KB, 186 views)
James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007, 08:17 PM   #2
omgwtfbyobbq
meat popsicle
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,789
A couple wild guesses
-It doesn't matter. With air flow exiting near the low pressure trunk area anyway, there's no point to smoothing the air stream right before turbulent separation.
-They also may want to induce some turbulence right before the back of the car, so that some of the air flowing under the car will curve up into the low pressure area behind the trunk, and the separation of airflow over the top/sides of the car wouldn't be influenced as much.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007, 08:28 PM   #3
brelandt
2002 Cavalier 4 dr
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bayou Gauche, LA
Posts: 102

All I could make out from that picture was an upside down coil spring....
__________________
brelandt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2007, 09:59 PM   #4
James
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 266
yeah, sorry the pic is upside down. what you are looking at is the back corner of the vehicle, looking toward the rear wheel.

Could be that they left it like that to create turbulence. Initially, I would have thought that Honda would have optimized everything on the car, but after seeing the aero results of Phil Knox and Bajoos, I am starting to give everything a closer look.

Last edited by James : 01-03-2007 at 10:04 PM.
James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 04:31 AM   #5
The Toecutter
Baby Killer
 
The Toecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 836
Quote:
A couple wild guesses
-It doesn't matter. With air flow exiting near the low pressure trunk area anyway, there's no point to smoothing the air stream right before turbulent separation.
-They also may want to induce some turbulence right before the back of the car, so that some of the air flowing under the car will curve up into the low pressure area behind the trunk, and the separation of airflow over the top/sides of the car wouldn't be influenced as much.
Another wild guess

-Some bean counter wanted to save about $1 off the materials costs without regard to the impact on the car's quality, basically telling the engineers to **** off.



Happens all the time in industry.
The Toecutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 02:09 PM   #6
omgwtfbyobbq
meat popsicle
 
omgwtfbyobbq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,789
Heh, yeah... VW uses plastic water pump impellers, plastic!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
omgwtfbyobbq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 11:48 PM   #7
red91sit
Member
I almost wonder if something is missing? The only reason i ask this is there is that empty circle ring thing, looks like it could be used to attach another plate, same with the bolt hole in the corner. The wheel spoilers also seem as if they were designed to work with more underbody. Hmmm
__________________
red91sit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 05:15 PM   #8
James
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 266
Yeah,
Maybe honda will just start adding the panels in a couple years, as the MPG competition between the hybrids gets more intense??
I just wish they would have done a better job with it...I dont think my dad would like me putting coroplast under there!
James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 05:52 PM   #9
cfg83
Senior Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,099
red91sit -

Quote:
Originally Posted by red91sit View Post
I almost wonder if something is missing? The only reason i ask this is there is that empty circle ring thing, looks like it could be used to attach another plate, same with the bolt hole in the corner. The wheel spoilers also seem as if they were designed to work with more underbody. Hmmm
Maybe the circle ring thing is for a ground effects kit for a non-Hybrid Civic sedan. Maybe the new Si.

CarloSW2
__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2007, 01:49 AM   #10
tjts1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 176

Theres always room for improvement even on supposedly very efficient cars. A first gen Prius (97-99, never sold in US) owner in Australia was able improve fuel economy at 100kph from 42mpg to 47mpg with a simple front belly pan. You would think the manufacturers would have installed on it from the factory if they were trying to build the model of efficiency.

He went from this


To this


In the end every component goes through a cost vs benefit analysis. Filling in that area behind the rear tire will probably improve fuel economy by a point or two but it wasn't worth it to Honda. It might be to you.
I still find it outrageous that hybrids like the Prius and Civic don't come with rear wheel skirts from the factory.

Last edited by tjts1 : 01-20-2007 at 01:58 AM.
tjts1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 09:36 AM   #11
invisiblegold
2001 Honda Insight
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11

Yeah, I agree. There was some old story about GM calculating the cost of fighting lawsuits compared to fixing the bolt that hooked a muffler to the gas tank. I guess they were exploding and killing people.

I have the notion that Macnamara talked about it in his movie "The Fog of War"...and that the few dollars per car was more than the hundreds of thousands in lawsuits. Then again, I have a terrible memory so it might have been an urban myth.

I'd like to think that they found other problems with the underbelly pans that we don't know about (like rust from water collection or cooling issues.) Or perhaps that it wasn't as important as we think.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------
John Waiveris - www.invisiblegold.com - www.waiveris.com

2001 Honda Insight 5sp
66 Lifetime MPG
84MPG 1000 miles GA to CT (one tank)
Tour De Sol 2006 - 93.7 mpg day 1 - 80.1 mpg day 2
---------------------------------------------------
invisiblegold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 09:39 AM   #12
invisiblegold
2001 Honda Insight
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11

PS: I also remember that the old Porsche 911s (1970s at least) were fully contained underneath. (until the way back) Motorheads have pointed out that it enabled Porsches to go faster with less horsepower than the American muscle car equivalents.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------
John Waiveris - www.invisiblegold.com - www.waiveris.com

2001 Honda Insight 5sp
66 Lifetime MPG
84MPG 1000 miles GA to CT (one tank)
Tour De Sol 2006 - 93.7 mpg day 1 - 80.1 mpg day 2
---------------------------------------------------
invisiblegold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 11:28 AM   #13
caprice
My Gas log updating soon.
 
caprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 120
[quote=tjts1;38274]
To this


Nice belly pan. Where is there more info on this one? Thanks.
caprice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 02:44 AM   #14
tjts1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 176

The story is from Autospeed, an Australian online magazine which I subscribe to.
http://autospeed.drive.com.au/cms/A_2456/article.html
The same car was also turbocharged for more power and even better fuel economy.
tjts1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 02:53 AM   #15
The Toecutter
Baby Killer
 
The Toecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 836
How much horsepower and FE did the car have with the turbo?

I've read of turbocharged Honda Insights that do 0-60 mph in 7 seconds and in normal driving haven't lost any fuel economy. Man, how fun that would be at speed with an optimized gear ratio...
The Toecutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 10:20 AM   #16
rh77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 2,379
Check out the top

I've been noticing on HCH-II's here that a small lip spoiler is standard. I always thought that a spoiler was for downforce -- but apparently it must serve some function of "finishing" the air over the car for efficiency:



RH77
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 11:40 AM   #17
MetroMPG
I should be WORKING now
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,791
Rick (and others):

rear drag-reducing spoiler explained: http://www.gassavers.org/showthread....kpot#post20378
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 11:57 AM   #18
rh77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 2,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Rick (and others):

rear drag-reducing spoiler explained: http://www.gassavers.org/showthread....kpot#post20378

Perfect! Thanks...

-Rick
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2007, 05:02 PM   #19
James
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 266
Yes I think the spoiler was put there for aero reasons. If you look at it from farther forward, you can see that it is not "flat" or parallel to the trunklid, but has about a 30 degree slope. This corresponds to what Phil Knox told me: the optimal angle for a trunklid spoiler was 30 degrees (I think-let me check back in my emails). He said angles above or below this would create more drag (on a typical sedan shape).
I think that a flat extention(or slightly downward sloping) would be beneficial for vans trucks and hatchbacks.
James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2007, 05:09 PM   #20
James
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 266
now that the picture is there, how much do you think the antenna on the top affects aerodynamic drag. I take it off when I am driving the car on the hwy.

Here is the message from Phil:
I think the chin spoiler is a good way to go,although I am
surprised that Toyota didn't already do that on the Camry.And I agree
with Dave about the effectiveness of the spoiler,as compared to a full
undertray.Extending the roofline out at an angle not to exceed 12-13
degrees should allow for attached flow 'til the end of the foil.The
rest of the air will swirl into a smaller version of the "locked"or
"captured" vortex,that presently preceeds your trunklid's rear
edge.Darin has succesfully pulled this off with his Firefly/Metro.I
ran a vey long version of this on my CRX to my advantage.Also,a rear
decklid spoiler,which leans back at an angle no greater than
30-degrees (as measured from the horizon)and projects rearward to a
point which intersects that 12-13 degree angle coming off your
roofline,would approximate an ideal fastback.Anything higher would
increase drag.Anything lower would increase drag.Steeper angles would
also raise drag.Just for giggles,you might want to project that line
out behind the car,just to see how close Toyota came to a "cleaner"
form.A round dowel about 18-inches tall, inserted into a shallow piece
of wood,and taped to the trunklid of the car,with six-inch strips of
bright yarn taped to the dowel every six-inches or so,would tell you
alot about the airflow there.A friend could drive as you sit in the
backseat watching "which way the wind blows".Happy experimenting,and
let us know how things progress,Phil.P.S. If you wanted to experiment
with Vortex-generators,those yarn tufts would reveal whether or not
they were pulling the flow down without separation.
James is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The history of hybrid cars Matt Timion General Fuel Economy Discussion 6 01-08-2007 02:04 PM
Review: 2007 Los Angeles Auto Show rh77 Articles 5 12-14-2006 04:07 AM
88 Civic D15z1 Swap, Getting Engine Code 16 What could it be? 8Civic8 Automotive Tech 9 11-03-2006 01:29 PM
Production 100mpg car coming chesspirate General Fuel Economy Discussion 10 07-24-2006 05:22 PM
Different Driving Techniques on Civic Hybrid James Experiments 4 05-16-2006 03:46 PM

Common topics of discusion include: gas mileage, fuel economy, best gas mileage car, MPG, miles per gallon, acetone, increase gas mileage
Archive Links: General Fuel Economy Dicussion - Experiments - General Tech - Automatic Transmissions - Diesels - Aerodynamic Modifications -
How To/Do It Yourself - Articles - Around the House - Electric/Solar Powered - People Powered - Vegetable Oil/Bio-Diesel - Hotel Price Comparison - VPS Hosting - Content Writing - Managed Hosting

 
Copyright 2005-2008 GasSavers.Org