|
|
02-05-2007, 07:53 AM
|
#1
|
|
Gasmiser
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mid michigan
Posts: 378
|
Gas shrinkage?
Lets say I fill my tank in 40 F weather, I'm still driving on that tank but now it is -10 F. Will it be a noticable change in volume? If so, then isn't that going to neg impact my FE for that tank, or is the denser gas going to "go farther"?
just wondering because it seems like my gauge dropped extra fast.
__________________
Best tank= 81.23 mpg on july 1st 2008
SAVE SOME GAS, SAVE THE WORLD!
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 08:06 AM
|
#2
|
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,406
|
Gas will change volume, slightly, perhaps, some argue not enough to be noticable. I don't know for sure. But it's unlikely to cause a noticable drop in fuel economy.
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 08:39 AM
|
#3
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 1,615
|
The volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion for gasoline is about 950 x 10^-6 cubic meters per degree C.
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 08:51 AM
|
#4
|
|
Ultra Aero Tempo!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina Canada (going to school in Winnipeg Canada)
Posts: 672
|
Allegedly it is quite noticeable. My Physics teacher once said that tanker trucks, when going from a hot location to a cool location, will suddenly have hundreds of dollars of less fuel than when they started out with if absolute volume was taken into play. This is why all the gasoline pumps I've seen declare "all volumes corrected to 15*C" to make sure everyone is paying the same price for gas.
There's been a few times where I'd fill my tank to the brim, drive around doing some arrands, and park my car in the garage. The next day, I'll try using a fuel additive and when I open the gas cap, fuel spurted everywhere!
Last edited by Peakster : 02-05-2007 at 10:47 AM.
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 09:10 AM
|
#5
|
|
Gasmiser
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mid michigan
Posts: 378
|
DV = bV DT (D is delta, b is thermal expansion coef, V volume, T temp)
If DV=.0095 m^3/C x .02712 m^3 x 27.78 C (.02712m^3 is 6 US liquid gallons of gas in tank, 27.78 C is change in temp) then my fuel changed volume by about .0005994 m^3 or .15835 US gallons or about 20 oz of gas. That could be equal to 8 - 8.5 miles of driving.
Probably not noticable with the fuel gauge.
__________________
Best tank= 81.23 mpg on july 1st 2008
SAVE SOME GAS, SAVE THE WORLD!
Last edited by jwxr7 : 02-05-2007 at 09:11 AM.
Reason: left out
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 09:14 AM
|
#6
|
|
I should be WORKING now
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,791
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwxr7
That could be equal to 8 - 8.5 miles of driving.
|
Except the amount of energy in your tank doesn't change with expansion/contraction.
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 09:18 AM
|
#7
|
|
Gasmiser
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mid michigan
Posts: 378
|
true, but does the engine actually get more energy when it burns the denser fuel or is it wasted by being too rich? May depend on car and state of tune.
__________________
Best tank= 81.23 mpg on july 1st 2008
SAVE SOME GAS, SAVE THE WORLD!
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 09:20 AM
|
#8
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 1,615
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwxr7
true, but does the engine actually get more energy when it burns the denser fuel or is it wasted by being too rich? May depend on car and state of tune.
|
This is why cars have o2 sensors - to compensate on the fly for this.
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 09:23 AM
|
#9
|
|
I should be WORKING now
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 4,791
|
I suppose it could have been true in the days of carburetors. Or pre o2 sensor FI (my old Rabbits all had FI, but I have no idea if they also had o2 sensors...)
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 09:26 AM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newport RI USA
Posts: 2,434
|
I read in the Synlube site that gasoline expands and contracts about twice that of water - just looked for a while and couldn't find the actual numbers however. You still have the same BTUs that you bought at the pump - but you should buy the gas right after a cold snap to get it at its coldest temperature at the pump. Just be careful of expansion as it warms up.
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 09:40 AM
|
#11
|
|
Gasmiser
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mid michigan
Posts: 378
|
I guess I won't use shrinkage  as an excuse for lower FE #s.
__________________
Best tank= 81.23 mpg on july 1st 2008
SAVE SOME GAS, SAVE THE WORLD!
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 03:50 PM
|
#12
|
|
FE nut
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,193
|
One day last summer, I decided to make some FE test runs so I drove about 6 miles to the station and filled up. I then drove about 25 miles or so and went back to the same station/pump and refilled. After squeezing as much gas as I possibly could into the tank, my mileage figured out to be way over 200 mpg. Apparently the fuel expanded enough to cause the mpg to be way off.
__________________
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall, torque is how much of the wall you take with you.
2007 Prius,

Team Slow Burn
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 04:56 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: belgium
Posts: 377
|
mmm
my car sits outside all the time and has a carb... yet these days despite the temperature flirting with freezing, once my car is warmed up it actually seems to drive a bit sweeter than usual... i thought it might be because it was getting more cold air, but could it just be that it's getting a richer mixture because of shrinkage?... i seem to require less throttle than before to attain a certain speed. could be something else of course....
this could alse mess up my gasslog as i have to resort to the "fill up to the brim at the same fuelpump" method to calculate my FE...
__________________
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 05:32 PM
|
#14
|
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,993
|
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 08:16 PM
|
#15
|
|
Ultra Aero Tempo!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina Canada (going to school in Winnipeg Canada)
Posts: 672
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondlarry
One day last summer, I decided to make some FE test runs so I drove about 6 miles to the station and filled up. I then drove about 25 miles or so and went back to the same station/pump and refilled. After squeezing as much gas as I possibly could into the tank, my mileage figured out to be way over 200 mpg. Apparently the fuel expanded enough to cause the mpg to be way off.
|
He hehe, it would be nice if one could get 200mpg+ every time a car was filled 25 miles later 
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 09:16 PM
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Newport RI USA
Posts: 2,434
|
Yup a second tank in the back of the car using a 45 liter beer or soda keg stainless steel and plenty of them around strong and able to withstand plenty of pressure. Top it off when the gas is cheep and pump it into the main tank when you need it.
|
|
|
02-05-2007, 10:22 PM
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,103
|
I could do with a smaller tank, ~6lbs a gallon and I haven't come close to running out yet, so I'm probably carrying an extra 30lbs or so of fuel I don't use.
Maybe I can inflate something neoprene in my tank and pull it out before a trip?!?
|
|
|
|