|
|
05-16-2007, 12:20 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
|
Most Efficient Auto Car
1. UfoTofU - 
2. repete86 - 
3. lindermant - 
4. OdieTurbo - 
5. zpilito -
:EDIT: current scoreboard, I will try to keep an Eye on this, but I'm rather busy lately with graduation, So feel free to PM me, if your number 5, or for any other reasons.
I was wondering who has the most fuel efficient Automatic Transmission car on this forum? I thought we could have our own fun little competition.
Just taking the numbers from the Fuel Competition, Zpilito seems to have the most gas friendly A/T car! at 42.44.
Anyone got anything higher than this?
::EDIT 2:: I shoudl have clarified this, the scoreboard is for Gasoline powered only vehicles, electric propulsion assistance is not included.
__________________
Last edited by red91sit : 08-30-2007 at 11:49 AM.
Reason: added Leader Board,
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 07:13 AM
|
#2
|
|
ECO-Driver
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pflugerville, Tx
Posts: 1,409
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by red91sit
I was wondering who has the most fuel efficient Automatic Transmission car on this forum? I thought we could have our own fun little competition.
Just taking the numbers from the Fuel Competition, Zpilito seems to have the most gas friendly A/T car! at 42.44.
Anyone got anything higher than this?
|
Percentage EPA wise Repete86 and his Accord put me to shame  then there's omgwtfbyobbq in the Camry.
Last edited by zpiloto : 05-16-2007 at 07:15 AM.
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 08:01 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 650
|
odieturbo is running an unmolested saturn around 40mpg. I'm not sure what his driving style is or if he's modded it yet.
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 11:44 AM
|
#4
|
|
Team Leftover Bananas!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Milford, PA
Posts: 244
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovemysan
odieturbo is running an unmolested saturn around 40mpg. I'm not sure what his driving style is or if he's modded it yet.
|
Thanks lovemysan, so far I've only pumped the air in the tires up to 45 PSI. As to driving style, keeping it at or under the speed limit (at 65 MPH on the highway, I'm the slowest guy there!) Easy on the throttle, no more than 2500 RPM max.
I've got some mods in mind, I was waiting to get in the FE competition (I'm now in it), and saving up some $$$.
See "The_Last_SL1" for a list of mods I plan on.
__________________
Captain - Team Leftover Bananas!

The_Last_SL1's conversion to better Fuel Efficiency is here
If you're new, take a peek at New Members Thread by rh77!
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 01:28 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 650
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OdieTurbo
Thanks lovemysan, so far I've only pumped the air in the tires up to 45 PSI. As to driving style, keeping it at or under the speed limit (at 65 MPH on the highway, I'm the slowest guy there!) Easy on the throttle, no more than 2500 RPM max.
I've got some mods in mind, I was waiting to get in the FE competition (I'm now in it), and saving up some $$$.
See "The_Last_SL1" for a list of mods I plan on.
|
I just checked your gaslog. Nice and consistant. You must be pretty careful to lock the convertor up. Diamondlarry was saying there's a trick way to lock the convertor in 2nd gear. You might pm'him about it.
It takes about 10min and 300 clicks to fill an SL tank.
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 01:36 PM
|
#6
|
|
meat popsicle
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,789
|
My Camry doesn't count, the EPA highway is wayyyy off compared to cruising with the tcc locked, and I have pretty nice driving conditions. I'd love a Saturn, w/ being able to coast four down. Given engine-off coasting opportunities, I'd be able to go from ~35mpg to ~40mpg. Course, that's nowhere near the 50-60+mpg I'd expect from a manual transmission w/ the right OD gearing, but it's still nice. I wonder if bump starting Saturns is easier on the engine w/ autos compared to manuals, with the fluid coupling and all?
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 05:11 PM
|
#7
|
|
The Right Lane Rollers!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,274
|
I don't think that AT cars can be bump started. They tend to go into neutral if the engine isn't spinning. Maybe I missed something.
Anyway, since it seems that most people buy AT cars, I hope that the manufacturers can make them a lot more efficient, and quickly.
__________________
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 08:48 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mpls. MN.
Posts: 293
|
We used to bump start auto's back in the old days. when we had sub zero temps a lot of cars would not start due to weaker batteries and starters that needed more power than current ones. we used a tow rope or chain and had to get going about 40mph before the engine would start spinning.
I would think that would be pretty hard on the tranny though.
|
|
|
05-16-2007, 09:02 PM
|
#9
|
|
meat popsicle
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mojave
Posts: 1,789
|
I was thinking it'd be easier on the engine than bump starting a manual, since the fluid coupling has more give than a direct mechanical connection, and the transmission would naturally drop into whatever gear, but i dunno crap about autos, so that's all speculation.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
Last edited by omgwtfbyobbq : 05-17-2007 at 11:28 PM.
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 10:55 PM
|
#10
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 109
|
So far, according to the Scangauge, the best I've gotten in my recently acquired '99 Metro with an auto tranny is 45.6 MPG. That was average over a 25 mile trip, at night (but the thing has daytime running lights so I can't see headlights making much difference), and in the rain. Maybe the humidity helped?
Been managing 40 MPG nearly every trip.
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 10:55 PM
|
#11
|
|
ECO-Driver
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pflugerville, Tx
Posts: 1,409
|
Curious how many of the auto are EOC'ing?
|
|
|
05-17-2007, 11:15 PM
|
#12
|
|
Team OPEC Busters!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 562
|
I do. You can start the motor back up while moving in neutral, but you need to hold it in start for a second longer than normal or else the engine will stall and refuse to start for about a minute.
__________________
All You Fascists Bound To Lose!
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 04:05 AM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ELF
We used to bump start auto's back in the old days. when we had sub zero temps a lot of cars would not start due to weaker batteries and starters that needed more power than current ones. we used a tow rope or chain and had to get going about 40mph before the engine would start spinning.
I would think that would be pretty hard on the tranny though.
|
On old automatic transmissions they had a pump working both ways, so that you COULD bump start them like you said. Since the 80's though, I dont' think any automatic transmissions have this feature
__________________
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 06:50 AM
|
#14
|
|
Team Leftover Bananas!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Milford, PA
Posts: 244
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zpiloto
Curious how many of the auto are EOC'ing?
|
Just started doing it! Finding more and more opportunities as well. I would like an engine kill and engine start button though. Diamondlarry just pm'd me how to put in an injector kill, I'll get that hooked up ASAP!
__________________
Captain - Team Leftover Bananas!

The_Last_SL1's conversion to better Fuel Efficiency is here
If you're new, take a peek at New Members Thread by rh77!
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 07:48 AM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 421
|
My CRX is auto and you can see my average below in my signature.
I have recently moved to a more congested area so that is undoubtedly going to change my MPG. I haven't gone through a full tank yet at our new address though.
__________________
- UfoTofU
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 11:06 PM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
|
Wow! there are some really exceptionally good gas mileage auto's on here! I'm hoping my gas mileage will go up soon, I'ts hard to get around to working on it with so much else going on (graduation next friday woot woot)
__________________
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 11:08 PM
|
#17
|
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,406
|
Last edited by SVOboy : 03-01-2009 at 06:34 PM.
|
|
|
05-23-2007, 03:58 PM
|
#18
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 476
|
Another auto CRX here. I've hit 42 mpg on long highway trips, cruising at around 75 mph. I generally get 34-37 in day to day driving. This is with a D16Z6 swap (done for power rather than FE) and the lockup solenoid wired to ignition switched power.
|
|
|
05-29-2007, 07:47 PM
|
#19
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Russell, Ohio, USA
Posts: 36
|
The Scion xB has an automatic and I'm using engine-off coasting daily during my commutes. I just got a ScanGauge II about a week ago and have begun to watch the instantaneous MPG and tank average. Today I managed to attain 40.3 mpg overall for my 26 mile roundtrip. That feels like progress.
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 11:31 AM
|
#20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
|
 Gotta start posting your fill ups in the gas logs 
__________________
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 11:59 AM
|
#21
|
|
Team Leftover Bananas!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Milford, PA
Posts: 244
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by red91sit
1. zpilito - 
2. UfoTofU - 
3. repete86 - 
4. OdieTurbo - 
|
Must... get... better... mileage...!!!
__________________
Captain - Team Leftover Bananas!

The_Last_SL1's conversion to better Fuel Efficiency is here
If you're new, take a peek at New Members Thread by rh77!
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 12:24 PM
|
#22
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OdieTurbo
Must... get... better... mileage...!!!
|
lol, your telling me, my last fill up was under 30 :'(. But for the next one, Im gonna use a FULL grill block, and just use an old a/c fan to suck in fresh air. Should work 
__________________
|
|
|
06-05-2007, 03:19 PM
|
#23
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 75
|
best tank on my '05 civic auto was 50mpg (last summer)... I've been slacking a bit and not posting too much here lately, but I did just update my gaslog
__________________
|
|
|
06-06-2007, 12:42 AM
|
#24
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
|
And we have all top 5 spots filled now! Time to see some competition up there. Hopefully I'll get there someday, but I haven't driven my car since last Saturday.
__________________
|
|
|
07-16-2007, 11:57 PM
|
#25
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 482
|
Ooh We've had some changes to the leader board!
__________________
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 12:38 AM
|
#26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 948
|
i love how we compete! i really want to make that list but it will be a while
__________________
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 08:16 AM
|
#27
|
|
Team Leftover Bananas!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Milford, PA
Posts: 244
|
Woohoo! I just hit 47.58 MPG on my last trip! Yay me! I rock! Wort wort! 
__________________
Captain - Team Leftover Bananas!

The_Last_SL1's conversion to better Fuel Efficiency is here
If you're new, take a peek at New Members Thread by rh77!
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 01:26 PM
|
#28
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey4mnhs
i love how we compete! i really want to make that list but it will be a while
|
I recently has 36+ mpg tank (Best ever) which I feel is excellent considering I was doing 27+ a couple months ago and 29 when I joined this site. I know I'l never make that list with "98 Camry" as the car is just to big compared to others gas-miser cars on this site. But it still feels good getting these mileage numbers. My goal is a 700 mile tank and 40 mpg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zpiloto
Curious how many of the auto are EOC'ing?
|
I heard (from users HERE) that its NOT good to EOC in an automatic unless your car is capable of being towed at regular speeds. I never knew that autos has issues with being toed on four wheel. Anyway, its not good for an automatic to be pushed/pulled and roll (Hence EOC) without the engine being on because your fluids responsible for lubing the tranny are not flowing. Please be care ODIE and make sure that EOC is not damaging your tranny. You should idle coast instead of EOC.
What is everyone else's take on this? There is a thread on this. Wish I knew where it was
|
|
|
07-17-2007, 09:05 PM
|
#29
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 948
|
i do a little eoc maybe 20 miles a tank if that. im to take a little risk to get a record tank but i wouldent do it all the time.
__________________
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 06:18 AM
|
#30
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 269
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StanleyD
...its not good for an automatic to be pushed/pulled and roll (Hence EOC) without the engine being on because your fluids responsible for lubing the tranny are not flowing... What is everyone else's take on this?
|
I can toss in some info from far left field.  Due to odd (and I hope temporary) circumstances, my SG is currently reporting transmission temperature instead of engine temperature.
Monday I drove about 150 miles with a clear sky and afternoon temperatures in the high 90s. The AT would normally run about 215F to 225F. However, during NICE-ON glides it would quickly climb to 230F or 235F. IIRC the highest temperature logged for the day was 240F.
I figure this is because the pump is circulating the transmission fluid more slowly at engine idle so heat has more of a chance to build up. No idea where the AT temperature sensor is located though, so that theory could be bogus. Regardless, it's another factor making me uneasy about neutral coasting in my car.
At any rate, on a VW Cabrio (Golf III platform) at least, even gliding in neutral with the engine on likely adds extra stress. I can only imagine what would happen with the engine off when there's no flow at all. (I can only imagine 'cuz I ain't tryin' it.  Except for 20 foot gravity starts from a parking space or the last five feet rolling into position after keying off.)
Rick
|
|
|
|