Home Forums Garage Blogs 201 Tips To Save Gas News Reviews Coupons FAQ UserCP Articles
  Mark All Forums Read -  Glossary -  Search The Forums -  View Recent Posts Log Out 

Go Back   GasSavers HomePage > Forums > Fuel Economy > Automatic Transmissions

Automatic Transmissions Discuss how to save on gas for vehicles with automatic transmissions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2007, 03:53 PM   #1
bowtieguy
Political Terrorist
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: O-Town FL, USA
Posts: 1,839
New Personal MPG Record

filled up today to a new personal mpg record(barely). 337.4 miles on 12.704 gal to the tune of 26.55(old record was 26.53). the 30mpg goal eludes me still!

this 1995 olds 88(AT) has gotten this far w/ acetone,gliding, and weight reduction. driving is aprx 35%city/65% hwy. yes acetone HAS worked for me(more on that later on another thread). a few of you have stated getting 30+ with the same 3.8 GM motor, but my question is has anyone achieved this in similar conditions? short answer: NO!

let me explain. i know of 3 other owners of the same EXACT vehicle (all 1995 or 96), driving the same roads,weather,etc. they ALL agree that ANY city driving adversely affects FE. my hwy driving is 70 mph and a/c on also. since i joined gassavers a year after getting the car, there are no gaslog entries showing before and after acetone(sorry). i did document(every fill-up) that my avg WAS 20-22. after each mod is confirmed(or not) i will go back to leaving out the acetone. EVERY time this is done, FE drops back to org #s.

next up, overinflated tires. then a grill block. very confident in achieving 30mpg. soon the a/c usage will go down(possibly deleted) due to cooler weather. also using scan gauge on my wife's car(mine is not compatible) to help with "the nut behind the wheel." we have the same motor, so hopefully this will help.

one last thing. i'd like to extend a personal thank you to all of you who have posted your ideas and info. even tho i started hypermiling before joining this site, i NEVER thought it possible to go from a low of 20mpg to closing in on 30 with subtle mods.
__________________
http://zradio.org/?
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer
http://lowertaxesnow.org/

Share my work ethic, not my wealth!
Fight organized crime: re-elect no one
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2007, 04:01 PM   #2
2TonJellyBean
"Right Lane Rollers"
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 367
Good stuff!

Any chance you could try a tank at 55 mph and 55 psi?
2TonJellyBean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2007, 04:16 PM   #3
bowtieguy
Political Terrorist
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: O-Town FL, USA
Posts: 1,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2TonJellyBean View Post
Good stuff!

Any chance you could try a tank at 55 mph and 55 psi?
sorry, i'd get "run over" on the FL turnpike(70mph). but i will try 65mph and 60psi(already increased). do you think 60 is too much?
__________________
http://zradio.org/?
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer
http://lowertaxesnow.org/

Share my work ethic, not my wealth!
Fight organized crime: re-elect no one
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2007, 04:44 PM   #4
2TonJellyBean
"Right Lane Rollers"
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 367
what are the sidewalls rated for?

i noticed a difference between 44 and 55... didn't think i would but i did

that and i couldn't really go beyond 50 psi with my bicycle floor pump and had to drop 50 cents! Grrr! L
2TonJellyBean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2007, 05:58 PM   #5
bowtieguy
Political Terrorist
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: O-Town FL, USA
Posts: 1,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2TonJellyBean View Post
what are the sidewalls rated for?

i noticed a difference between 44 and 55... didn't think i would but i did

that and i couldn't really go beyond 50 psi with my bicycle floor pump and had to drop 50 cents! Grrr! L
sidewalls rated at 44.

something that might interest your 55mph suggestion: i drive a couple of stretches of 55mph zones out side the turnpike. so, to offset the 65mph(rather than 70) turnpike a bit, was considering driving those sections at 50. according to the scan gauge, that is the max FE for my wife's car, again, same engine.
__________________
http://zradio.org/?
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer
http://lowertaxesnow.org/

Share my work ethic, not my wealth!
Fight organized crime: re-elect no one

Last edited by bowtieguy : 10-11-2007 at 06:20 PM.
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2007, 06:28 PM   #6
cfg83
Senior Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,099
bowtieguy -

Quote:
Originally Posted by bowtieguy View Post
sidewalls rated at 44.

something that might interest your 55mph suggestion: i drive a couple of stretches of 55mph zones out side the turnpike. so, to offset the 65mph(rather than 70) turnpike a bit, was considering driving those sections at 50. according to the scan gauge, that is the max FE for my wife's car, again, same engine.
Ok, good stuff. That was going to be my next question. Are the transmissons the same for each car?

CarloSW2
__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2007, 07:00 PM   #7
bowtieguy
Political Terrorist
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: O-Town FL, USA
Posts: 1,839
Carlos,

great question. no, her car(a camaro) is rear wheel drive. so, the trannies are not the same. however, i have noticed both cars have TC lock up near 50 mph @ 1500 rpm. 40mph is 2k rpm as is 65 and over(70 is about 2200). so, 50-65 is where i want to be right?

BTW everyone, ABA(more like AB...AB, since acetone can't be removed in tank) testing w/ acetone using the scan gauge on my wife's car leads me to believe it does NOT work(inconclusive) for the camaro. tried this tank to tank and came up w/ the same conclusion. can't say why, just want to give info on experiments w/out bias. the olds likes it, the camaro doesn't!
__________________
http://zradio.org/?
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer
http://lowertaxesnow.org/

Share my work ethic, not my wealth!
Fight organized crime: re-elect no one

Last edited by bowtieguy : 10-12-2007 at 04:54 PM.
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2007, 07:10 PM   #8
cfg83
Senior Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,099
bowtieguy -

Quote:
Originally Posted by bowtieguy View Post
Carlos,

great question. no, her car(a camaro) is rear wheel drive. so, the trannies are not the same. however, i have noticed both cars have TC lock up near 50 mph @ 1500 rpm. 40mph is 2k rpm as is 65 and over(70 is about 2200). so, 50-65 is where i want to be right?
Others can comment better than me, but if they're behaving the same, then I think you should be fine.

CarloSW2
__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2007, 11:30 AM   #9
brucepick
Member
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southeastern CT - USA
Posts: 723
Granted this would be expensive to test, but how about synthetic transmission fluid? Mobil 1. I'm changing over but have no comparison numbers, sorry.

For my car, at every 4K mi. oil change I drain the tranny pan once and replace the old with Mobil 1. I calculated that's approx the same rate you change it at when you go 30K mi and then flush the whole system. My next such swap will be #3; with that done it will be approx 70% synthetic.
__________________
Currently getting low 40's mpg in pre-Spring weather. Current EPA is 31/39 so low 40's is not too shabby. WAI mod done.

Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
brucepick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2007, 04:29 PM   #10
bowtieguy
Political Terrorist
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: O-Town FL, USA
Posts: 1,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucepick View Post
Granted this would be expensive to test, but how about synthetic transmission fluid? Mobil 1. I'm changing over but have no comparison numbers, sorry.

For my car, at every 4K mi. oil change I drain the tranny pan once and replace the old with Mobil 1. I calculated that's approx the same rate you change it at when you go 30K mi and then flush the whole system. My next such swap will be #3; with that done it will be approx 70% synthetic.
i'm def with ya on the syn lubes. same with before and after #s 'cause i will NOT put dino oils in my cars.
__________________
http://zradio.org/?
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer
http://lowertaxesnow.org/

Share my work ethic, not my wealth!
Fight organized crime: re-elect no one
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2007, 01:31 AM   #11
garyhgaryh
Member
 
garyhgaryh's Avatar
Bowtieguy,
That's excellent mileage! I would love to get 30mpg on my Typhoon. What have you done to your 3.8 to get that type of mileage?
Thanks,
Gary
garyhgaryh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2007, 07:41 PM   #12
8307c4
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 227

I would highly recommend you read up on what under or over inflating does to your tires, your car, and the handling!

First you're reducing grip, your tire will have considerably less surface on the road!
Second your tire will wear unevenly, if you over inflate even 10% past the max psi printed on the side of the tire, the center of your treads will wear faster than the inside and outside, you will see.

Then your tire is bigger in diameter which affects your speedometer adversely, it could say you're doing 40mph when in reality you're doing 45!

All of these affect safety!
You may not be able to stop in time in a bad situation!

Perhaps you have cheap tires but if they're rated 44psi I doubt it, they are made of petrol too and my nicer tires cost $100 each so there's no way I'm sacrificing neither tire nor safety for mpg.

If you want less road grip why not try a slightly less wide tire in the first place, say you're running 205's you could try 195's, that would be a far safer option IMO. Don't forget to go up on your sidewall one number, so if they're 55's you want to go 65, this will help offset the speedometer misscalibration.

And yes, you can go one size up or down without the need for new rims, if you compensate via the sidewall height method then your speedo should only be off 2-3 mph at most legal speeds.
__________________
A FE gauge should be standard equipment in every vehicle.

Last edited by 8307c4 : 11-14-2007 at 07:45 PM.
8307c4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Creating a Switch to Shut Off Cylinders on the Fly SVOboy General Fuel Economy Discussion 78 10-08-2009 09:13 AM
Spark plug mod zpiloto General Fuel Economy Discussion 56 08-28-2009 10:47 PM
driving technique: pulse & glide (long) MetroMPG Hypermiling 45 11-20-2008 03:45 PM
Some ridic article by some fool SVOboy Articles 39 06-09-2007 06:18 PM

Common topics of discusion include: gas mileage, fuel economy, best gas mileage car, MPG, miles per gallon, acetone, increase gas mileage
Archive Links: General Fuel Economy Dicussion - Experiments - General Tech - Automatic Transmissions - Diesels - Aerodynamic Modifications -
How To/Do It Yourself - Articles - Around the House - Electric/Solar Powered - People Powered - Vegetable Oil/Bio-Diesel - Hotel Price Comparison - VPS Hosting - Content Writing - Managed Hosting

 
Copyright 2005-2008 GasSavers.Org