Home Forums Garage Blogs 201 Tips To Save Gas News Reviews Coupons FAQ UserCP Articles
  Mark All Forums Read -  Glossary -  Search The Forums -  View Recent Posts Log Out 

Go Back   GasSavers HomePage > Forums > Fuel Economy > General Fuel Economy Discussion

General Fuel Economy Discussion Ask the gas gurus about increasing fuel economy. Post ideas and ask for advice. For testing help, use the "Experiments" forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-2008, 05:26 PM   #1
jasonty
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12

Aluminum Flywheel

Hey folks! I have a 94 Civic DX coupe, HX wheels, carbon fiber hood, nothing in the trunk, no A/C (yet) no P/S, manual windows and door locks. I just took the car in to get a VX transmission installed (since my DX trans was trashed from the previous fast and furious owner) that I found at a junkyard, and the guy told me that my flywheel couldn't be machined, too far gone. So, I thought it would be a great time to upgrade to an aluminum flywheel. I'm trying to put my car on a diet to get down to VX weight, which is hard since I have a coupe, but I'm close! Next is the D15Z1 swap, just waiting for my 207K mile D15B7 to go. Here's my reasoning for it, feel free to comment/criticize!

1. Between shifts the aluminum flywheel would allow the RPM's to drop much lower, faster, than with a steel flywheel. That small amount of time would mean nothing after a month, but after several months to a year, there must be some FE benefit.

2. It takes the engine less momentum to turn an aluminum flywheel than a steel flywheel, so the engine will not have to work as hard (provide as much fuel) to propel the car. Since this is rotating mass, this seems to be a huge benefit.

3. The overall weight of the flywheel is 7 lbs, compared to the 16-18 lbs of the stock flywheel. Less overall weight in the vehicle would take less fuel to propel the vehicle. Same as the theory of stripping out the interior of a race car, except in that case, you have more power pushing less weight.

4. The aluminum flywheel has a replaceable steel friction surface, and a replaceable starter ring gear, so this should be the last flywheel I'll have to buy. It was $130 shipped off eBay, and the steel flywheel was $62, only machinable once or twice.

Last edited by jasonty : 03-20-2008 at 05:32 PM. Reason: Added information
jasonty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 09:58 PM   #2
kamesama980
Sarcasm Inc.
 
kamesama980's Avatar
as long as it's a recognized name brand company that made it, great. cheap no-name ones have been known to warp or wear prematurely even with the steel inserts.
__________________
-Russell
1987 Chevy S10 pickup. short bed, short cab, not even power brakes.
1990 Toyota Cressida 7M-GE 3.0 DOHC I6/W58 5-speed manual
Resident carpenter, stagehand, rigger, mechanic, and know-it-all smartass
"You don't get to judge me for how I fix what you break"
read this or face my wrath
kamesama980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 08:44 AM   #3
beatr911
Tightwad
 
beatr911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 170
Couldn't say if you'd see any MPG benefit, I wouldn't expect much at least not enough to cover the added expense. The primary benefit though is a little quicker accelleration. The engine will be a little more eager to increase or decrease speed since there is less mass to change speed.

I personally like light flywheel engines. You may want to use a short throw shifter as well as the lighter flywheel will require faster shifts for smooth gear transitions.
beatr911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 11:24 AM   #4
rangerbentman
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: N.Vancouver
Posts: 32

Steel is used for a reason. Inertia of an object to allow your engine to maintain torque as you drive the little slopes in the road with out constant gas pedal use.
rangerbentman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 04:10 PM   #5
jasonty
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12

I think manufacturers use still because of drivability issues. Steel flywheels provide smoother shifting and a better driving experience. Same reason why they use so much sound deadening material, or excessive slippage in automatic transmissions. I'm trying to reduce the overall weight of the car as well, about 200 pounds, so 10 pounds from the flywheel will help me a lot. I'm trying to make my coupe as light as a VX without sacrificing too many commodoties. And, since I'm adding A/C which weighs 25 pounds, with the new flywheel, it will be like I'm only adding 15 pounds. Well, I'm on my way to pick the car up now, I'll let you folks know how it turned out! Thanks for all of the replies and info!
jasonty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 04:43 PM   #6
kamesama980
Sarcasm Inc.
 
kamesama980's Avatar
reason #1: steel is much cheaper than aluminum. reason #2: it lasts a lot longer so they can call the car more reliable. it also dampens engine vibrations so they don't have to smooth out the idle the last 5%. it won't give you 1/100 ftlb difference in steady rpm or slow rpm change torque.

if you use heavier pedal, you might get .1 mpg difference. if you barely rev the engine like most people here you may not be able to measure it at all.
__________________
-Russell
1987 Chevy S10 pickup. short bed, short cab, not even power brakes.
1990 Toyota Cressida 7M-GE 3.0 DOHC I6/W58 5-speed manual
Resident carpenter, stagehand, rigger, mechanic, and know-it-all smartass
"You don't get to judge me for how I fix what you break"
read this or face my wrath
kamesama980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 05:22 PM   #7
jasonty
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12

Well I just got the car back, and I must say, I'm sold on aluminum flywheels. It drives the same, shifting is a little different since the RPM's drop very fast between shifts, and starting out in first is going to take some getting used to. Partly because I'm not used to having a new clutch, and partly because the engine wants to drop the RPM's so quickly that it's a bit more difficult to keep it from stalling. I stalled it right when I pulled out of the shop. All in all, a great purchase, I like the way the engine revs, and drops the RPM's quicker.

But the flywheel was not the biggest difference I noticed, the VX transmission swap was!!

So putting a VX trans on a D15B7 is not a good idea if you have any hope of keeping your current performance or reaching 60mph in under 10 seconds. I'm assuming the VX trans is well suited to the power band of the D15Z1, as was the DX trans to the D15B7. But a VX trans does not belong in a DX coupe. The DX trans moved the car MUCH faster. So fast that I was amazed that 102hp could do so much, compared to my 350hp 80 Camaro. Now, with the VX trans, this thing is a dog. I'm in 4th gear at 50 mph, still under 2300 RPM's. With the DX trans, I'd have to be in 5th just to turn the same RPM's. But, then again, I didn't buy this car to be fast, I bought it to be great on gas, and it looks like it's going to achieve just that extremely well. It really is like night and day. Overall, I'd take the VX trans over the DX trans any day, just because it's going to save me tons at the gas pump, I can already tell from the 10 miles I drove it.

Last edited by jasonty : 03-21-2008 at 05:24 PM. Reason: Spelling error
jasonty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 10:57 PM   #8
DRW
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 541
Since your gearing is taller now, maybe you could save a few more pounds by getting lower profile tires? That'll reduce the gearing slightly, save some weight, and reduce rolling resistance, too.

I have a light flywheel in both of my cars. The racecar has an 8 pound Fidanza, which I like a lot. My Laser has a 12 pound chromoly flywheel.
I got the light flywheel to improve FE since the car has to accellerate from a stop many times each day on my commute.

With a light flywheel I found I can shift gears earlier, keep the rpms down and still accellerate at a decent rate. A light flywheel makes more of a difference in lower gears, so it helps improve FE when driving around town, or anytime you have to accellerate at low speeds. It doesn't make much difference in top gear on a freeway, or anytime the cars speed is held steady.

The issue of loosing torque with a light flywheel is just a myth. The motor makes torque, not the flywheel.
__________________
Dave W.
DRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2008, 11:24 PM   #9
DRW
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 541
Here's a good link describing how a light flywheel behaves.
www.pumaracing.co.uk/FLYWHEEL.htm
Thanks to whoever originally posted it here, very nice.
__________________
Dave W.
DRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heavy flywheel to improve idling and low rpm torque HAHA Experiments 16 11-24-2007 10:35 AM
Best Civic Clutch and Flywheel???? kwtorbe Automotive Tech 12 06-06-2007 09:33 PM
aluminum vs. steel Erdrick General Fuel Economy Discussion 18 05-25-2007 08:04 AM
Larger/Heavier Flywheel rh77 General Fuel Economy Discussion 14 09-11-2006 02:54 AM
Flywheel weight reduction? Matt Timion General Fuel Economy Discussion 10 09-25-2005 12:26 PM

Common topics of discusion include: gas mileage, fuel economy, best gas mileage car, MPG, miles per gallon, acetone, increase gas mileage
Archive Links: General Fuel Economy Dicussion - Experiments - General Tech - Automatic Transmissions - Diesels - Aerodynamic Modifications -
How To/Do It Yourself - Articles - Around the House - Electric/Solar Powered - People Powered - Vegetable Oil/Bio-Diesel - Hotel Price Comparison - VPS Hosting - Content Writing - Managed Hosting

 
Copyright 2005-2008 GasSavers.Org